首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood >Question 1. Is cerebral function monitoring as accurate as conventional EEG in the detection of neonatal seizures?
【24h】

Question 1. Is cerebral function monitoring as accurate as conventional EEG in the detection of neonatal seizures?

机译:问题1.在检测新生儿癫痫发作中,脑功能监测是作为常规脑电图的准确性吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A term baby girl is admitted to the neonatal unit following concerns regarding abnormal movements noted on the postnatal ward. She is reported to have had tonic posturing of the limbs and back-arching at 10 h of age. As the neonatal registrar on the night shift, you are asked to review the baby and you wonder whether cerebral function monitoring (CFM) of the baby would be an effective and accurate method of detecting seizure activity.Is CFM or amplitude EEG (aEEG) [index test] as accurate as conventional EEG (cEEG) [comparison] in detecting seizures [outcome] in term neonates [population]?A search of the EMBASE and MEDLINE healthcare databases (limits: publication year 1974-current and English language) identified 42 articles (search performed March 2010).
机译:一个术语女婴在后期病房上指出的异常运动后呼吁新生儿单位。 据报道,她曾在10小时的10小时内有肢体和背部拱的滋补姿势。 作为夜班的新生儿注册商,您被要求审查宝宝,并且您怀疑婴儿的脑功能监测(CFM)是一种有效且准确地检测癫痫发作活动的方法.IS CFM或振幅EEG(AEEG)[ 索引试验]作为常规EEG(CEEG)[比较]检测癫痫发作[群体[人口]的癫痫发作[遗传]?搜索EMBASE和MEDLINE HEATHCARE数据库(限制:出版物1974年 - 当前和英语)确定42 文章(搜索第2010年3月)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号