...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of cardiovascular diseases >Quantitative assessment of primary mitral regurgitation using left ventricular volumes obtained with new automated three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic software: A comparison with 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance
【24h】

Quantitative assessment of primary mitral regurgitation using left ventricular volumes obtained with new automated three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic software: A comparison with 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance

机译:用新的自动三维经脉冲超声心动图软件使用左心室体积进行初级二尖瓣反流的定量评估:与3-Tesla心脏磁共振的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundQuantitative assessment of primary mitral regurgitation (MR) using left ventricular (LV) volumes obtained with three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (3D TTE) recently showed encouraging results. Nevertheless, 3D TTE is not incorporated into everyday practice, as current LV chamber quantification software products are time consuming. AimsTo investigate the accuracy and reproducibility of new automated fast 3D TTE software (HeartModelA.I.; Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA, USA) for the quantification of LV volumes and MR severity in patients with isolated degenerative primary MR; and to compare regurgitant volume (RV) obtained with 3D TTE with a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) reference. MethodsFifty-three patients (37 men; mean age 64±12 years) with at least mild primary isolated MR, and having comprehensive 3D TTE and CMR studies within 24h, were eligible for inclusion. MR RV was calculated using the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method and the volumetric method (total LV stroke volume minus aortic stroke volume) with either CMR or 3D TTE. ResultsInter- and intraobserver reproducibility of 3D TTE was excellent (coefficient of variation≤10%) for LV volumes. MR RV was similar using CMR and 3D TTE (57±23mL vs 56±28mL;P=0.22), but was significantly higher using the PISA method (69±30mL;P<0.05 compared with CMR and 3D TTE). The PISA method consistently overestimated MR RV compared with CMR (bias 12±21mL), while no significant bias was found between 3D TTE and CMR (bias 2±14mL). Concordance between echocardiography and CMR was higher using 3D TTE MR grading (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=0.89) than with PISA MR grading (ICC=0.78). Complete agreement with CMR grading was more frequent with 3D TTE than with the PISA method (76% vs 63%). Conclusion3D TTE RV assessment using the new generation of automated software correlates well with CMR in patients with isolated degenerative primary MR.
机译:使用用三维经线超声心动图(3D TTE)获得的左心室(LV)体积(3D TTE)最近展示了令人鼓舞的结果,对初级二尖瓣流反流动(MR)的影响。尽管如此,3D TTE未被纳入日常做法,因为当前的LV室量化软件产品是耗时的。 AIMSTO调查新的自动化快速3D TTE软件(HeartModela.i.i; Philips Healthcare,Andover,Ma,USA)的准确性和再现性,用于定量LV体积和孤立的退化原发性先生患者的严重程度;并比较用心磁共振(CMR)参考的3D TTE获得的反尿壶体积(RV)。方法患者(37名男子;平均64±12年),至少温和的主要分离MR,并在24小时内进行全面的3D TTE和CMR研究,有资格包含。使用近端等管型表面积(PISA)方法和具有CMR或3D TTE的体积方法(总LV行程体积减去主动脉中风音量)来计算MR RV。用于LV体积的3D TTE的结果和3D TTE的垄断再现性是优异的(变异系数≤10%)。 RV先生使用CMR和3D TTE类似(57±23ml Vs 56±28ml; P = 0.22),但使用PISA方法显着更高(69±30ml; P <0.05与CMR和3D TTE相比)。 PISA方法与CMR(偏置12±21ml)相比,PISA方法始终如一地高估RV,而3D TTE和CMR之间没有发现显着的偏差(偏置2±14ml)。超声心动图和CMR之间的一致性使用3D TTE MR分级(腹部相关系数[ICC] = 0.89)比PISA MR分级(ICC = 0.78)。 3D TTE比PISA方法更频繁地与CMR分级的完全协议(76%VS 63%)。结论3D采用新一代自动化软件的TTE RV评估与孤立的退化原发性MR患者的CMR相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号