首页> 外文期刊>Applied Soil Ecology >Substituting ecological intensification of agriculture for conventional agricultural practices increased yield and decreased nitrogen losses in North China
【24h】

Substituting ecological intensification of agriculture for conventional agricultural practices increased yield and decreased nitrogen losses in North China

机译:替代农业生态强化进行常规农业实践增加产量和北方氮损失下降

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is global concern about the adverse impacts of conventional agricultural practices on the environment. Recent evidence has shown that ecological intensification (EI) of agriculture can safeguard the environment from negative impacts of agricultural practices and simultaneously produce substantially higher crop productivity. Here, we employed the concept of EI and compared it with conventional agriculture or farmer's practice (FP). We explored the effects of EI and FP treatments on maize yield, N losses via potential nitrification activity (PNA), potential denitrification activity (PDA), N2O emissions, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and nitrogen (N) cycling microbial populations associated with nitrification and denitrification in fluvo-aquic soil and black soil of North China. There were four treatments, i.e., EI N-, FP N-, EH N+, FP N + at each site, - and + indicate no N addition and N addition, respectively. The results revealed that across the two soils, N addition increased PNA and PDA; however, compared with the FP N + treatment, lower PNA and PDA were observed in the EI N + treatment. Similarly, the abundance of N cycling genes, including AOA amoA and AOB amoA, for nitrification and nirS, nirK, and nosZ for denitrification were significantly increased under N addition, and compared with the FP N + treatment, reduced abundance was noted in the EI N + treatment. N2O and GHG emissions were quantified, and it was observed that, in comparison to the FP treatment, reduced N2O and GHG emissions occurred in EI treatments in the two locations. EI with best management practices also increased crop yield relative to FP. Owing to higher N rates in FP treatments, substantial soil acidification was noted in FP plots but not in EI plots. In addition, PNA and PDA were significantly positively linked with soil nitrifying and denitrifying communities, particularly in the black soil. Moreover, the N availability pathway rather than soil acidification mainly regulated N cycling microbial communities. Our results suggest that EI could be a sustainable and environmentally friendly approach due to higher crop productivity and lower N losses via PNA, PDA, N2O, and GHG emissions, thus preventing the negative impact of agricultural practices, especially N fertilization, on the environment.
机译:全球对常规农业实践对环境的不利影响。最近的证据表明,农业的生态强化(EI)可以保护环境免受农业实践的负面影响,同时产生显着提高的作物生产力。在这里,我们雇用了EI的概念,并将其与传统农业或农民的实践(FP)进行比较。我们探讨了EI和FP治疗对玉米产量的影响,通过潜在的硝化活性(PNA),潜在的脱氮活性(PDA),N2O排放,温室气体(温室气体(GHG)排放和氮气(N)循环微生物群体相关华北氟沃水土土壤和黑土硝化与脱氮。在每个部位有四种处理,即Ei N-,FP N-,EH N +,FP N +, - 并且分别表示NO N添加和N添加。结果表明,在两种土壤中,增加了增加的PNA和PDA;然而,与FP N +处理相比,在EI N +处理中观察到降低PNA和PDA。类似地,在N加入下,对于硝化和NIRS,NIRK和NOSZ,包括AOA AmoA和Aob AmoA,包括AOA AmoA和Aob AmoA的丰度显着增加,并且与FP N +处理相比,在EI中注意到降低的丰度n +治疗。量化N2O和温室气体排放量,并且观察到与FP处理相比,在两个地点的EI治疗中发生了降低的N2O和温室气体排放。具有最佳管理实践的EI还增加了相对于FP的作物产量。由于FP处理中的较高率,在FP地块中注意到了实质的土壤酸化,但不在ei图中。此外,PNA和PDA与土壤硝化和反硝化群落显着呈正相关,特别是在黑土中。此外,N可用性途径而不是土壤酸化主要调节N循环微生物群落。我们的研究结果表明,由于较高的作物生产力和通过PNA,PDA,N2O和温室气体排放,EI可能是一种可持续和环保的方法,从而防止农业实践,特别是施肥对环境的负面影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号