首页> 外文期刊>Applied Psychological Measurement >Multilevel Modeling of Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment: The Multilevel DINA Example
【24h】

Multilevel Modeling of Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment: The Multilevel DINA Example

机译:认知诊断评估的多级建模:多级迪娜示例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many multilevel linear and item response theory models have been developed to account for multilevel data structures. However, most existing cognitive diagnostic models (CDMs) are unilevel in nature and become inapplicable when data have a multilevel structure. In this study, using the log-linear CDM as the item-level model, multilevel CDMs were developed based on the latent continuous variable approach and the multivariate Bernoulli distribution approach. In a series of simulations, the newly developed multilevel deterministic input, noisy, and gate (DINA) model was used as an example to evaluate the parameter recovery and consequences of ignoring the multilevel structures. The results indicated that all parameters in the new multilevel DINA were recovered fairly well by using the freeware Just Another Gibbs Sampler (JAGS) and that ignoring multilevel structures by fitting the standard unilevel DINA model resulted in poor estimates for the student-level covariates and underestimated standard errors, as well as led to poor recovery for the latent attribute profiles for individuals. An empirical example using the 2003 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study eighth-grade mathematical test was provided.
机译:已经开发出许多多级线性和项目响应理论模型来解释为多级数据结构。然而,大多数现有的认知诊断模型(CDMS)本质上是Uni联的,并且当数据具有多级结构时,可以不适用。在本研究中,使用Log-Linear CDM作为项目级模型,基于潜在连续的可变方法和多变量Bernoulli分布方法开发多级CDM。在一系列模拟中,新开发的多级确定性输入,嘈杂和门(DINA)模型用作评估忽略多级结构的参数恢复和后果。结果表明,新的多级DINA中的所有参数都通过使用自由软件刚刚使用另一个GIBBS采样器(JAG)并通过拟合标准的Unilevel Dina模型来忽略多级结构导致学生级协变量的估计差,低估了标准错误,以及导致个人潜在属性配置文件的恢复差。提供了使用2003年国际数学和科学研究趋势的实证例子,提供了八年级数学测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号