首页> 外文期刊>Animal >Impact of automatic milking systems on dairy cattle producers' reports of milking labour management, milk production and milk quality
【24h】

Impact of automatic milking systems on dairy cattle producers' reports of milking labour management, milk production and milk quality

机译:自动挤奶系统对奶牛生产商报告挤奶管理,牛奶生产和牛奶品质的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Automatic milking systems (AMS), or milking robots, are becoming widely accepted as a milking technology that reduces labour and increases milk yield. However, reported amount of labour saved, changes in milk yield, and milk quality when transitioning to AMS vary widely. The purpose of this study was to document the impact of adopting AMS on farms with regards to reported changes in milking labour management, milk production, milk quality, and participation in dairy herd improvement (DHI) programmes. A survey was conducted across Canada over the phone, online, and in-person. In total, 530 AMS farms were contacted between May 2014 and the end of June 2015. A total of 217 AMS producers participated in the General Survey (Part 1), resulting in a 41% response rate, and 69 of the respondents completed the more detailed follow-up questions (Part 2). On average, after adopting AMS, the number of employees (full- and part-time non-family labour combined) decreased from 2.5 to 2.0, whereas time devoted to milking-related activities decreased by 62% (from 5.2 to 2.0 h/day). Median milking frequency was 3.0 milkings/day and robots were occupied on average 77% of the day. Producers went to fetch cows a median of 2 times/day, with a median of 3 fetch cows or 4% of the herd per robot/day. Farms had a median of 2.5 failed or incomplete milkings/robot per day. Producers reported an increase in milk yield, but little effect on milk quality. Mean milk yield on AMS farms was 32.6 kg/cow day. Median bulk tank somatic cell count was 180 000 cells/mt. Median milk fat on AMS farms was 40% and median milk protein was 3.3%. At the time of the survey, 67% of producers were current participants of a DHI programme. Half of the producers who were not DHI participants had stopped participation after adopting AMS. Overall, this study characterized impacts of adopting AMS and may be a useful guide for making this transition.
机译:自动挤奶系统(AMS)或挤奶机器人被广泛接受作为减少劳动力并提高牛奶产量的挤奶技术。然而,报告的劳动量保存,牛奶产量的变化,以及转换到AMS的牛奶质量很大。本研究的目的是记录在挤奶管理,牛奶生产,牛奶质量和参与乳制品改善(DHI)计划的情况下,记录在农场上采用AMS对农场的影响。通过电话,网上和人员在加拿大进行了一项调查。总共有530年5月530日在2014年5月和2015年6月底之间联系。共有217名AMS制片人参加了一般调查(第1部分),导致了41%的回复率,69名受访者完成了更多详细的后续问题(第2部分)。平均而言,在采用AMS后,员工人数(全日制和兼职非家庭劳动)从2.5减少到2.0,而致力于挤奶相关活动的时间减少了62%(从5.2到2.0小时/天)。中位挤奶频率为3.0挤奶/日,机器人平均占用了一天的77%。生产者去了奶牛的中位数为2次/天,中位数为3奶牛或每个机器人/天的4%的牛群。农场每天有2.5个失败或不完整的挤奶/机器人的中位数。生产者报告牛奶产量增加,但对牛奶质量的影响很小。 AMS农场的平均牛奶率为32.6公斤/牛日。中位散装罐体细胞计数为180 000个细胞/ mt。 AMS农场的中位牛奶脂肪为40%,中位数牛奶蛋白为3.3%。在调查时,67%的生产商是DHI计划的当前参与者。在采用AMS之后,不是DHI参与者的一半是没有DHI参与者的参与。总体而言,这项研究表征了采用AMS的影响,并且可能是制造这种过渡的有用指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号