首页> 外文期刊>Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice >Enhancing mentoring experiences through e-mentoring: a systematic scoping review of e-mentoring programs between 2000 and 2017
【24h】

Enhancing mentoring experiences through e-mentoring: a systematic scoping review of e-mentoring programs between 2000 and 2017

机译:通过电子指导加强辅导经验:2000年至2017年之间的电子指导计划的系统范围审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Mentoring is suffering from a shortage of trained mentors which compromise the efficacy of novice mentoring or mentoring between a senior clinician and a junior clinician. E-mentoring is proposed as a means of supplementing this dominant form of mentoring in medicine by providing accessible, timely and longitudinal support for mentees. However, with little is known about e-mentoring nor its role in a blended mentoring approach, a systematic scoping review is proposed to evaluate these gaps in understanding in order to better understand e-mentoring and assess the viability of employing e-mentoring practice to support novice mentoring. Using Arksey and O'Malley's (Int J Soc Res Methodol 8(1):19-32, 2005) approach, 5 reviewers carried out independent literature reviews of e-mentoring as an adjuvant to novice mentoring in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Google Scholar, Scopus, GreyLit, OpenGrey, and Web of Science databases. Braun and Clarke's (Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77-101, 2006) thematic analysis approach was used to thematically analyse accounts of e-mentoring across different settings. 6557 abstracts were identified, 109 full text articles were reviewed, and 18 articles were included and thematically analysed. The themes identified include definitions, role, stages, processes, platforms, evaluation, and relationships in e-mentoring. The themes identified provide a clinically relevant definition of e-mentoring, and in highlighting the similarities in the phases of novice and e-mentoring reaffirms the validity of a blended approach as a means of addressing shortfalls in mentoring in medicine.
机译:指导遭受了训练有素的导师的短缺,这些导师损害了新手媒化或在高级临床医生和初级临床医生之间的疗效。通过为助手提供可访问,及时和纵向支持,提出了e-endering作为补充药物在医学中的主要形式的手段。然而,对于E-MENTERINGEN NESION IS辅导或其在混合的指导方法中的作用很少,提出了一个系统的范围审查,以评估这些差距,以便更好地理解电子指导并评估雇用电子指导实践的可行性支持新手指导。使用ARKSEY和O'MALLEY(INT J SOC RES MODELOL 8(1):19-32,2005)方法,5名审查员对E-MENTORING的独立文献审查作为佐剂,EMBMED,PSYCINFO,ERIC ,系统性评论的Cochrane数据库,Google Scholar,Scopus,Greylit,OpenGrey和科学数据库网络。 Braun和Clarke的(Qual ResCoscol 3(2):77-101,2006)专题分析方法用于主题分析不同设置的电子指导的账户。 6557摘要被识别,审查了109条全文文章,包括18篇文章并进行主题分析。确定的主题包括电子指导中的定义,角色,阶段,过程,平台,评估和关系。确定的主题提供了电子指导的临床相关定义,并且在突出新手阶段的相似之处,电子指导重申将混合方法的有效性作为解决医学中指导缺陷的手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号