...
首页> 外文期刊>Appetite >Exploring the roles of physical effort and visual salience within the proximity effect
【24h】

Exploring the roles of physical effort and visual salience within the proximity effect

机译:探索近距离效应内体力努力和视力的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Recent work has explored the effectiveness of the Proximity Effect, where increasing the physical distance between consumer and snacks reduces intake. Foods requiring less effort to attain, or being more visually appealing, are seen to be consumed more. Relatedly, perceived effort and visual salience are suggested mechanisms for the proximity effect, but no prior studies have directly manipulated these in association with the effect. Two between-subjects studies conducted in university laboratories are presented. Method: Twenty chocolate brownies that were either wrapped or unwrapped (Study 1, N= 85), or 250g of M& M's, either colourful or plain brown (Study 2, N= 80), were presented as effort and salience manipulations respectively to participants at either 20 cm or 70 cm. Consumption was measured as `likelihood of consumption' (Yes/No) and `actual consumption' (units/grams). Potential moderating variables including perceived effort and perceived visual salience were also measured. Results: Likelihood of consumption was positively predicted by perceived visual salience in both Studies, and by distance in Study 2. Significant main effects of distance, p 70 cm), effort, p wrapped), and distancexeffort interaction, p=.003,.2= 0.111, were observed in Study 1 for actual consumption. A main effect of distance was found in Study 2 for actual consumption, p 70 cm). Perceived visual salience positively correlated with actual consumption in both Studies. Conclusions: Increasing physical effort and placing snacks further away appear to act independently and interactively to reduce snack consumption. Manipulating snack colour does not appear to influence consumption, whereas perceptions of visual salience appear to influence consumption. As such, perceived visual salience and physical effort are thought to be key mechanisms underpinning the proximity effect. Pre-registration: Both Studies were pre-registered on the Open Science Framework (Study 1: 10.31234/osf.io/ rmnys; Study 2: 10.31234/osf.io/u8bsz).
机译:背景:最近的工作已经探讨了邻近效应的有效性,在那里增加了消费者和零食之间的物理距离减少了摄入量。需要更少努力获得或更具视觉上吸引力的食物被认为被占用更多。涉及,有人提出了对邻近效应的建议机制的感知和视力,但没有先前的研究直接操纵这些与效果相关。提出了在大学实验室进行的两项受试者研究。方法:包裹或未包装的二十巧克力果仁巧克力果仁巧克力果仁巧克力(研究1,n = 85),或250克的M&M,无论是鲜艳的还是普通的棕色(研究2,n = 80),分别呈现给参与者的努力和显着操纵在20厘米或70厘米处。消费量被测量为“消费可能性”(是/否)和“实际消费”(单位/克)。还测量了包括感知努力和感知视力的潜在调节变量。结果:通过研究中的视觉显着性和研究中的距离,消费的可能性是积极预测的2.距离2.距离,P 70cm),努力,P包裹的显着主要影响),以及距离交互,P = .003,。 2 = 0.111,在研究1中观察到实际消费。在研究2中发现了距离的主要效果,用于实际消耗,p 70cm)。感知视力与两项研究中的实际消耗正相关。结论:越来越远离体质努力和放置零食,似乎独立和交互方式,以减少零食消耗。操纵零食颜色不会影响消耗,而对视觉显着的看法似乎影响消耗。因此,认为视力视力和体力努力被认为是支撑邻近效应的关键机制。预注册:两项研究都在开放式科学框架上预先登记(研究1:10.31234 / OSF.IO / RMNYS;研究2:10.31234 / OSF.IO / U8BSZ)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号