首页> 外文期刊>ANZ journal of surgery >Local anaesthesia for haemorrhoidal rubber band ligation reduces immediate post‐operative recovery time and use of opioid analgesia
【24h】

Local anaesthesia for haemorrhoidal rubber band ligation reduces immediate post‐operative recovery time and use of opioid analgesia

机译:痔疮橡皮筋结扎的局部麻醉降低了立即术后恢复时间和阿片类镇痛的使用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Haemorrhoidal rubber band ligation (RBL) is a well‐established, safe and cost‐effective treatment for bleeding haemorrhoids. It is generally well tolerated; however, some patients may require narcotic analgesia or even admission to hospital for pain management. This comparative cohort study reports on the difference in peri‐procedural analgesia administration and post‐operative recovery time between patients who received local anaesthetic (LA) infiltration in addition to RBL, compared with patients treated only with RBL. Methods Consecutive patients with haemorrhoids treated over a 3‐month period with LA infiltration in addition to RBL were compared to a consecutive control group who received RBL alone in the preceding 3?months. Clinical data were collected prospectively for LA group and retrospectively for the control group. Data collected included analgesia administered during the procedure and in recovery, as well as the mean time to discharge. Results A total of 32 patients treated with LA infiltration following RBL for haemorrhoids were compared with 22 patients who were treated with RBL alone. There was a reduction in the administration of intra‐procedural parecoxib in the LA group ( P ??0.001). Following the procedure, there was a reduction in the administration of both oral and intravenous opioid analgesia ( P = 0.009) and reduced mean time to discharge in the LA group ( P ??0.001). Conclusion Infiltration of LA proximal to the band following RBL for haemorrhoids reduced the administration of analgesia both during the procedure and in recovery, as well as mean time to discharge following the procedure.
机译:摘要背景痔疮橡皮筋连接(RBL)是一种良好的,可用于出血的痔疮的良好,安全和经济高效的处理。它通常耐受良好;然而,一些患者可能需要麻醉镇痛或甚至入院为医院进行疼痛管理。该比较队列研究报告了仅与RBL治疗的患者相比,接受局部麻醉剂(LA)浸润的患者患者之间的患者患者患者患者患者患者的差异差异。方法将在3个月内治疗的痔疮的痔疮除了RBL之外,除了RBL之外还与RBL的连续对照组进行比较,他们在前3个月内单独接受RBL。临床资料预期为La Group收集,并回顾性对照组。收集的数据包括在程序期间和恢复期间施用的镇痛,以及平均排放时间。结果将RBL用于痔疮的La渗透治疗的32例患者与单独用RBL处理的22例进行比较。在La Group中施用内含内帕氏氧化杀菌剂(p≤≤0.001)。在该过程之后,施用口服和静脉内阿片类镇痛的给药(P = 0.009)并降低了La Group中的平均排出的平均时间(p≤10.001)。结论RBL后腹膜腹膜腹腔的渗透降低了在程序中和恢复过程中镇痛的施用,以及在程序后的平均时间放电。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号