...
首页> 外文期刊>Climate and Development >Pastoral community coping and adaptation strategies to manage household food insecurity consequent to climatic hazards in the cattle corridor of Uganda
【24h】

Pastoral community coping and adaptation strategies to manage household food insecurity consequent to climatic hazards in the cattle corridor of Uganda

机译:牧区社区应对和适应策略,以管理乌干达牛走廊中的气候危害所造的家庭粮食不安全

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Establishing short and long term measures that pastoral and agropastoral households use to ensure they have access to food in periods of climate extremes could provide insights into ways to support households in similar conditions. Using semi-structured elicitation, 15 purposively selected participants from case households and 13 community leaders, in the central cattle corridor of Uganda were interviewed in January to February 2013. Thematic analysis revealed four coping strategies: harvesting immature food crops, selling off cattle, searching for alternative water sources and using alternative non-production-based means to access food. Three adaptation strategies identified were: diversifying livelihood activities, changing agricultural practices and investing in alternative water sources. Several strategies were related to incremental crop system changes, to maintain the existing way of practice. However, some were transformational, like formerly specialized livestock keepers taking on crop farming. Some strategies presented environmentally erosive effects; which could be curbed by evaluating the opportunity cost of diversification and transformative practices in relation to incremental adaptation. Insights gleaned could assist researchers to consider aspects for in-depth adaptation analysis and inform on how policies and institutions in Uganda could be used to facilitate, rather than undermine, pastoralists' coping and adaptation; and thus guide interventions to strengthen food security.
机译:建立短期和长期措施,牧区和农业家庭使用,以确保他们在气候极端期间可以获得食物,可以为支持家庭在类似条件下支持家庭的洞察力。在2013年1月至2月,在乌干达的中央牛走廊中使用半结构性委员会,从案例家庭和13个社区领导人进行了15个杀虫挑选的参与者。专题分析显示了四种应对策略:收获未成熟的食物作物,卖掉牛,搜索对于替代水源,并使用基于替代的非生产方法来获取食物。确定的三种适应策略是:多样化生计活动,改变农业实践和投资替代水源。有几种策略与增量作物系统的变化有关,以维持现有的实践方式。然而,有些是转型的,就像以前专门的牲畜饲养员服用作物养殖。一些策略提出了环保效果;这可以通过评估与增量适应有关的多样化和变革实践的机会成本来遏制。收集的见解可以帮助研究人员考虑深入适应性分析的方面,并告知乌干达的政策和机构如何用于促进,而不是破坏牧民的应对和适应;因此,引导干预措施加强粮食安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号