首页> 外文期刊>Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology: the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc >Differences in the Selvester QRS score after primary PCI strategy and conservative treatment for STEMI patients with negative T waves
【24h】

Differences in the Selvester QRS score after primary PCI strategy and conservative treatment for STEMI patients with negative T waves

机译:在原发性PCI策略和保守治疗中的溶剂QRS评分的差异和负面T波的患者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background According to current guidelines, the main indications for PCI in patients with STEMI are ST‐segment deviations and defined time from the onset of symptoms. Negative T wave at admission can be a sign of prolonged ischemia or spontaneous reperfusion. In both situations, the urgent intervention is questionable. We evaluated the infarct size and in‐hospital mortality in STEMI patients with negative T wave in cases of primary PCI strategy compared with conservative treatment. Methods A retrospective analysis of 116 STEMI patients with negative T wave at the presenting ECG was performed. Sixty‐eight patients (59%) underwent primary PCI strategy (PCI group), and 48 (41%) were treated conservatively (non‐PCI group). The infarct size estimated by using the Selvester score, and in‐hospital mortality were evaluated. Results The difference between Selvester score values at admission and at discharge in the non‐PCI group was statistically significant (1.48; 95% CI 0.694–2.27), while no significant difference was observed in the PCI group (?0.07; 95% CI ?0.546–0.686). The in‐hospital mortality was higher in the non‐PCI group; however, the numbers were relatively small: PCI 2 (2.9%) and non‐PCI 5 (10.4%). Conclusion In this study, we showed a reduction in the infarct size estimated by Selvester score in STEMI patients with negative T wave who were treated conservatively, while there was no significant change in the infarct size after primary PCI strategy. The higher mortality in patients treated conservatively could be attributed to higher age and comorbidities in the non‐PCI group. It seems that conservative treatment strategy might be an option in STEMI patients with negative T wave.
机译:摘要背景根据当前指南,Stemi患者PCI的主要适应症是ST段偏差和症状发作的定义时间。入院时的阴性T波可以是延长缺血或自发再灌注的标志。在这两种情况下,紧急干预是值得怀疑的。与保守治疗相比,我们在原发性PCI策略的情况下评估了Stemi患者的Infarct大小和医院内部死亡率。方法采用呈现ECG在呈现ECG中的116个末端患者的回顾性分析。保守(非PCI组)治疗六十八名患者(59%)的初级PCI策略(PCI组)和48(41%)。评估了通过使用SELVester评分估计的梗塞大小以及住院医生的死亡率。结果非PCI组入院和放电时塞维斯特评分值之间的差异有统计学意义(1.48; 95%CI 0.694-2.27),而在PCI组中没有观察到显着差异(0.07; 95%CI? 0.546-0.686)。非PCI集团的住院死亡率更高;然而,这些数字相对较小:PCI 2(2.9%)和非PCI 5(10.4%)。结论在本研究中,我们表现出梗死患者估计的梗塞大小的梗死尺寸减少了患有保守治疗的阴性T波的STEMI患者,而原发性PCI战略在梗塞大小没有显着变化。保守治疗的患者的较高死亡率可归因于非PCI组中的较高年龄和合并症。似乎保守治疗策略可能是负面T波的STEMI患者中的一种选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号