首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Microwave and thermal balloon ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review.
【24h】

Microwave and thermal balloon ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review.

机译:微波和热气球消融治疗严重的月经出血:系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of two second generation endometrial ablation techniques (microwave and thermal balloon endometrial ablation) with first generation techniques of endometrial ablation to treat heavy menstrual bleeding in women. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Library (issue 3, 2002), the National Research Register, MEDLINE (1966 to August 2002), Embase (1980 to August 2002) and Web of Science Proceedings (all years). We also searched reference lists and contacted experts and manufacturers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials and controlled trials of microwave endometrial ablation and thermal balloon endometrial ablation versus transcervical resection and rollerball ablation, alone or in combination, to treat heavy menstrual bleeding were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted data. As there was considerable clinical and methodological heterogeneity among the studies, meta-analysis was not undertaken and results are presented descriptively. RESULTS: Two randomised controlled trials of microwave endometrial ablation and eight trials (six randomised controlled trials) of thermal balloon endometrial ablation were included in the review. No significant differences were found between first and second generation techniques in terms of amenorrhoea, bleeding patterns, pre-menstrual symptoms, patient satisfaction or quality of life. Microwave endometrial ablation and thermal balloon endometrial ablation had significantly shorter operating and theatre times than first generation techniques. Adverse effects were few with all techniques, but there were fewer peri-operative adverse effects with second generation techniques. CONCLUSION: Microwave endometrial ablation and thermal balloon endometrial ablation are alternatives to first generation techniques for treating heavy menstrual bleeding. No head-to-head trials of microwave endometrial ablation and thermal balloon endometrial ablation have been undertaken and there is not yet enough evidence of differences in clinical effectiveness between these two techniques.
机译:目的:比较两种第二代子宫内膜消融技术(微波和热气球内膜消融)与第一代子宫内膜消融技术治疗女性经期严重出血的效果。搜索策略:我们搜索了Cochrane图书馆(第3期,2002年),国家研究注册,MEDLINE(1966年至2002年8月),Embase(1980年至2002年8月)和Web of Science Proceedings(所有年份)。我们还搜索了参考列表,并联系了该领域的专家和制造商。选择标准:包括随机对照试验和微波子宫内膜切除术,热球囊子宫内膜切除术与经颈宫颈切除术和滚珠球切除术(单独或联合使用)治疗经期大出血的对照研究。数据收集和分析:两位审稿人独立选择研究以纳入和提取数据。由于研究之间存在相当大的临床和方法异质性,因此未进行荟萃分析,并且描述性地给出了结果。结果:两项子宫内膜消融的随机对照试验和热球囊内膜消融的八项试验(六项随机对照试验)纳入了该评价。在第一代技术和第二代技术之间,在闭经,出血模式,经前症状,患者满意度或生活质量方面均未发现明显差异。与第一代技术相比,微波子宫内膜切除术和热球囊子宫内膜切除术的手术和手术时间显着缩短。所有技术的不良反应都很少,但是第二代技术的围手术期不良反应却较少。结论:微波子宫内膜切除术和热球囊子宫内膜切除术是第一代治疗经期大出血的技术的替代方法。尚未进行微波子宫内膜切除术和热球囊子宫内膜切除术的头对头试验,并且还没有足够的证据证明这两种技术在临床有效性方面存在差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号