...
首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
【24h】

Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:慢性疼痛的氯胺酮输注:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: IV ketamine is widely used to treat patients with chronic pain, yet the long-term impact remains uncertain. We synthesized evidence from randomized control trials to investigate the effectiveness of IV ketamine infusions for pain relief in chronic conditions and to determine whether any pain classifications or treatment regimens are associated with greater benefit. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar, as well as the website from inception through December 16, 2017 for randomized control trials comparing IV ketamine to placebo infusions for chronic pain that reported outcomes for >= 48 hours after the intervention. Three authors independently screened the studies, pooled the data, and appraised risk of bias. Random-effects model was used to calculate weighted mean differences for pain scores and secondary outcomes. Our primary outcome was the lowest recorded pain score >= 48 hours after cessation of treatment. Secondary outcomes included responder rate and adverse effects. RESULTS: Among 696 studies assessed for eligibility, 7 met inclusion criteria. All studies except one were at high risk of bias. These studies randomly assigned 211 patients with neuropathic (n = 2), mixed (n = 2), and nonneuropathic (nociplastic or nociceptive) (n = 3) pain. Three studies reported significant analgesic benefit favoring ketamine, with the meta-analysis revealing a small effect up to 2 weeks after the infusion (mean difference in pain scores, -1.83 points on a 0-10 numerical rating scale; 95% CI, -2.35 to -1.31 points; P < .0001). In the 3 studies that reported responder rates, the proportion with a positive outcome was greater in the ketamine than in the placebo group (51.3% vs 19.4%; relative risk, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.10-5.40; P = .029; I-2 = 0.0%). No differences were noted based on pain classification or condition. Compared to low-dose ketamine studies and investigations that evaluated non-complex regional pain syndrome conditions, a small but nonsignificant greater reduction in pain scores was found among studies that either utilized high-dose ketamine therapy (P = .213) or enrolled complex regional pain syndrome patients (P = .079). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that IV ketamine provides significant short-term analgesic benefit in patients with refractory chronic pain, with some evidence of a dose-response relationship. Larger, multicenter studies with longer follow-ups are needed to better select patients and determine the optimal treatment protocol.
机译:背景:IV氯胺酮广泛用于治疗患有慢性疼痛的患者,但长期的影响仍然不确定。我们从随机对照试验中综合证据来研究IV酮胺输注对慢性病症疼痛缓解的有效性,并确定是否有任何疼痛分类或治疗方案与更高的益处有关。方法:我们搜索了Medline,Embase和Google Scholar,以及2017年12月16日开始的网站,用于随机对照试验比较IV氯胺酮对慢性疼痛的放置输注,报告在干预后48小时内报告的慢性疼痛。三位作者独立筛选研究,汇总数据,并评估偏见的风险。随机效应模型用于计算疼痛评分和二次结果的加权平均差异。我们的主要结果是最低记录的疼痛评分>延迟治疗后48小时。二次结果包括响应率和不利影响。结果:评估的696项研究中,7次符合纳入标准。除了一个外面的所有研究都处于偏见的高风险。这些研究随机分配了211例神经疗法(n = 2),混合(n = 2),并且非对话(Nociplastic或Nociceptive)(n = 3)疼痛。三项研究报告了有次抗酮胺的显着镇痛益处,具有Meta分析,揭示输注后2周的少量效果(疼痛评分的平均差异-1.83点; 95%CI,-2.35到-1.31点; p <.0001)。在报告响应率的3项研究中,氯胺酮的阳性结果比例大于安慰剂组(51.3%Vs 19.4%;相对风险,2.43; 95%CI,1.10-5.40; P = .029; I-2 = 0.0%)。基于疼痛分类或条件,没有注意到差异。与低剂量的氯胺酮研究和评估进行了评估的非复杂的区域疼痛综合征条件,在高剂量氯胺酮治疗(P = 0.213)或纳入复杂的区域的研究中发现了小但不显着的疼痛评分。疼痛综合征患者(P = .079)。结论:证据表明,IV氯胺酮为耐火慢性疼痛的患者提供了显着的短期镇痛益处,具有一些剂量 - 反应关系的证据。更大,需要使用更长的随访的多中心研究以更好地选择患者并确定最佳治疗方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号