首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >A comparison of intraarticular lumbar facet joint steroid injections and lumbar facet joint radiofrequency denervation in the treatment of low back pain: A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial
【24h】

A comparison of intraarticular lumbar facet joint steroid injections and lumbar facet joint radiofrequency denervation in the treatment of low back pain: A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial

机译:细胞腔腰椎面关节类固醇注射和腰部关节辐射辐射去除症治疗低腰疼痛的比较:随机,控制,双盲试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Lumbar facet joint degeneration is a source of chronic low back pain, with an incidence of 15% to 45% among patients with low back pain. Various therapeutic techniques in the treatment of facet-related pain have been described in the literature, including intraarticular lumbar facet joint steroid injections and radiofrequency denervation. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of intraarticular facet joint steroid injections and radiofrequency denervation. METHODS: Our randomized, double-blind, controlled study included patients who received intraarticular steroid infiltrations in the lumbar facet joints (L3/L4-L5/S1) and patients who underwent radiofrequency denervation of L3/L4-L5/S1 segments. The inclusion criteria were based first on magnetic resonance imaging findings showing hypertrophy of the facet joints L3/L4-L5/S1 and a positive response to an intraarticular test infiltration of the facet joints L3/L4-L5/S1 with local anesthetics. The primary end point was the Roland-Morris Questionnaire. Secondary end points were the visual analog scale and the Oswestry Disability Index. All outcome assessments were performed at baseline and at 6 months. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were randomized; 24 of 29 patients in the steroid injection group and 26 of 27 patients in the denervation group completed the 6-month follow-up. Pain relief and functional improvement were observed in both groups. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for the primary end point (95% confidence interval [CI], -3 to 4) and for both secondary end points (95% CI for visual analog scale, -2 to 1; 95% CI for Oswestry Disability Index, -18 to 0). CONCLUSIONS: Intraarticular steroid infiltration or radiofrequency denervation appear to be a managing option for chronic function-limiting low back pain of facet origin with favorable short- and midterm results in terms of pain relief and function improvement, but improvements were similar in both groups.
机译:背景:腰椎小关节变性是慢性腰痛的源极,为15%至45%的患者有腰痛中的发病率。在小面有关的疼痛的治疗中的各种治疗技术已经在文献中描述,包括关节内腰椎小关节类固醇注射和射频去神经。在这项研究中,我们比较关节突关节注射类固醇和射频去神经的功效。方法:我们的随机,双盲,对照研究纳入谁在腰椎小关节接收关节内渗透类固醇的患者(L3 / L4-L5 / S1)和患者谁L3 / L4-L5 / S1段的后行射频去神经。纳入标准上磁共振成像结果示出小面关节L3 / L4-L5 / S1和小面关节L3 / L4-L5 / S1与局部麻醉剂的关节内渗透测试的肯定响应的肥大第一基于。主要终点是罗兰莫里斯问卷。次要终点是视觉模拟评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数。所有的结果评估是在基线和6个月进行。结果:53名患者被随机分配;的29名患者的类固醇注射组和27的26名患者的去神经组24完成了6个月的随访。在这两个组中观察到的疼痛缓解和功能的改善。有用于初级终点2组之间没有差异显著(95%置信区间[CI],-3〜4)和两个次要终点(95%CI为视觉模拟量表,-2至1; 95% CI为Oswestry功能障碍指数,-18至0)。结论:关节内注射类固醇的渗透或射频去神经似乎是慢性功能限制的低背面起源与良好的短期和中期结果缓解疼痛和功能改善方面疼痛管理选项,但改善是在两组相似。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Department of Orthopedics University Hospital Goettingen Robert-Koch-Stra?e 40 D-37075 G?ttingen;

    Department of Orthopedics and Rheumatology University Hospital Marburg Marburg Germany;

    Department of Orthopedics University Hospital Goettingen Robert-Koch-Stra?e 40 D-37075 G?ttingen;

    Department of Orthopedics and Rheumatology University Hospital Marburg Marburg Germany;

    Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology Philipps University Marburg Marburg Germany;

    Department of Orthopedics and Rheumatology University Hospital Marburg Marburg Germany;

    Department of Orthopedics and Rheumatology University Hospital Marburg Marburg Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 麻醉学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号