首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists/European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists Practice Advisory for the Management of Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.
【24h】

Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists/European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists Practice Advisory for the Management of Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.

机译:心血管麻醉学家社会/欧洲心胸麻醉人协会术后心脏手术术术围手术性心房颤动的实践咨询。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (poAF) is the most common adverse event after cardiac surgery and is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and hospital and intensive care unit length of stay. Despite progressive improvements in overall cardiac surgical operative mortality and postoperative morbidity, the incidence of poAF has remained unchanged at 30%-50%. A number of evidence-based recommendations regarding the perioperative management of atrial fibrillation (AF) have been released from leading cardiovascular societies in recent years; however, it is unknown how closely these guidelines are being followed by medical practitioners. In addition, many of these society recommendations are based on patient stratification into "normal" and "elevated" risk groups for AF, but criteria for that stratification have not been clearly defined. In an effort to improve the perioperative management of AF, the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) Clinical Practice Improvement Committee developed a multidisciplinary Atrial Fibrillation Working Group that created a summary of current best practice based on a distillation of recent guidelines from professional societies involved in the care of cardiac surgical patients. An evidence-based set of survey questions was then generated to describe the current practice of perioperative AF management. Through collaboration with the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists (EACTA), that survey was distributed to the combined memberships of both the SCA and EACTA, yielding 641 responses and resulting in the most comprehensive understanding to date of perioperative AF management in North America, Europe, and beyond. The survey data demonstrated the broad range of therapies utilized for the prevention and treatment of poAF, as well as a spectrum of adherence to published guidelines. With the goal of improving adherence, a graphical advisory tool was created with an easily accessible format that could be utilized for bedside management. Finally, given that no evidence-based threshold currently exists to differentiate patients at normal risk to develop poAF from those at elevated risk, the SCA/EACTA AF working group created a list of poAF risk factors using expert opinion and based on published risk score models for poAF. This approach allows stratification of patients into risk groups and facilitates adherence to the evidence-based recommendations summarized in the graphical advisory tool. It is our hope that these new additions to the clinical toolkit for the management of perioperative AF will improve the evidence-based care and outcomes of cardiac surgical patients worldwide.
机译:术后心房颤动(POAF)是心脏手术后最​​常见的不良事件,与发病率,死亡率和医院的发病率,死亡率和医院和重症监护单位保持一致。尽管对整体心脏手术术治疗死亡率和术后发病率进行了逐步的改善,但POAF的发病率保持不变,30%-50%。近年来,有关心房颤动(AF)的围手术期管理的一些基于证据的建议;然而,这是未知的,这些指导方针被医学从业者所遵循。此外,许多这些社会建议基于患者分层进入“正常”和“升高”的AF的风险群体,但该分层的标准尚未明确定义。为了改善AF的围手术期管理,心血管麻醉学会(SCA)临床实践改进委员会制定了一个多学科的心房颤动工作组,基于蒸馏来自参与的专业社会的最新指南,创造了当前最佳实践的摘要心脏手术患者的护理。然后生成基于证据的调查问题,以描述围手术期AF管理的目前的实践。通过与欧洲心胸麻醉师(EACTA协会协会的合作,该调查分发给SCA和EACTA的合并成员资格,产生了641个响应,并导致北美,欧洲围攻AF管理日期最全面的理解,超越。调查数据展示了用于预防和治疗POAF的广泛疗法,以及对公布的指导方针的依赖范围。通过进入遵守遵守的目的,创建了一种图形咨询工具,具有可用于床边管理的易于访问格式。最后,鉴于目前没有基于证据的阈值,以在正常风险下区分患者以从升高风险的情况下开发POAP,SCA / EACTA AF工作组使用专家意见创建了一份POAF危险因素的列表,并基于已发表的风险得分模型对于Poaf。这种方法允许患者分层纳入风险群体,并促进遵守图解咨询工具总结的基于证据的建议。我们希望这些新增的临床工具包用于围手术期AF的管理,将改善全球心脏手术患者的循证护理和结果。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    From the Department of Anesthesiology Perioperative and Pain Medicine Brigham and Women's;

    Department of Anesthesiology Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center Lebanon New Hampshire;

    Department of Anesthesiology Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine New York University Langone;

    Division of Cardiology University of Washington Seattle Washington;

    Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts;

    From the Department of Anesthesiology Perioperative and Pain Medicine Brigham and Women's;

    Department of Cardiology South Tampa Center for Advanced Healthcare Tampa Florida;

    Department of Anesthesiology Missoula Anesthesiology Missoula Montana;

    Duke University Medical Center Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham North Carolina;

    Department of Anesthesiology Education and Research Anesthesiology Lehigh Valley Hospital;

    Department of Anesthesiology Ronald Reagan University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Medical;

    Division of Cardiac Surgery University of Ottawa Heart Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada;

    From the Department of Anesthesiology Perioperative and Pain Medicine Brigham and Women's;

    Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery Brown Medical School and Rhode Island Hospital Providence;

    Department of Anesthesiology Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina;

    Department of Perioperative Medicine Barts Heart Centre St Bartholomew's Hospital London United;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 麻醉学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号