...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of industrial medicine >Occupational noise exposure and asymmetric hearing loss: Results from the HUNT population study in Norway
【24h】

Occupational noise exposure and asymmetric hearing loss: Results from the HUNT population study in Norway

机译:职业噪声暴露和不对称性听力损失:挪威狩猎人口研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background A large population study with adequate data on confounders is required to determine whether asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) is associated with occupational noise exposure. Methods We performed a cross‐sectional population study in Norway (the Health Investigation in Nord‐Tr?ndelag: HUNT) with 24?183 participants, using pure‐tone audiometry and questionnaires. AHL was defined as a difference in hearing threshold between the right and left ears of greater than or equal to 15?dB for the pure‐tone average of 0.5 to 2 or 3 to 6?kHz. Results The mean age of the participants was 53 years (range, 19‐99); 53% were women. The prevalence of AHL in this general Norwegian population was 6% for the 0.5 to 2?kHz range and 15% for 3 to 6?kHz. In unadjusted regression models, subjects reporting prolonged occupational noise exposure to high‐level noise sources (N?=?1652) had a higher risk of AHL at 3 to 6?kHz than those reporting no prior exposure (odds ratio [OR], 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75‐2.25). After adjustment for age and sex, OR was 1.08; (95% CI, 0.95‐1.24). After additional adjustment for head trauma, ear infections, blasting or shooting (all associated with AHL), smoking, and diabetes, OR was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.87‐1.16). No association between occupational noise and right‐ear hearing threshold advantage (left‐right ear difference) was observed after adjustment for confounders. Conclusion Our study suggests that AHL is relatively common in the general population, especially at the high‐frequency range in men and elderly subjects. Our study showed no relation between occupational noise exposure and AHL after confounder adjustment.
机译:摘要背景需要对混凝器充分数据的大人口研究是必要的,以确定非对称听力损失(AHL)与职业噪声暴露有关。方法我们在挪威(Nord-TR?Ndelag的健康调查:Hunt)进行了24次参与者的横断面口研究(Nord-TR?Ndelag:Hunt),使用纯音听力测量仪和问卷调查。 AHL被定义为大于或等于15≤DB的右侧和左耳之间的听力阈值的差异,用于纯音平均为0.5至2或3至6ΩkHz。结果参与者的平均年龄为53岁(范围,19-99); 53%是女性。挪威人群中AHL的患病率为0.5至2Ω·kHz的范围为6%,3至6?KHz。在不调整的回归模型中,报告长期职业噪声暴露于高级噪声源(n?=Δ1652)的患者风险较高,AHL风险较高3至6?KHz,而不是报告未经证实的曝光(赔率比[或],1.98 ; 95%置信区间[CI],1.75-2.25)。调整年龄和性别后,或1.08; (95%CI,0.95-1.24)。在额外调整头部创伤,耳朵感染,爆破或射击(所有与AHL相关),吸烟和糖尿病,或1.00(95%CI,0.87-1.16)。在调整混凝剂后观察到职业噪声和右耳听力阈值优势(左右耳差)之间没有关联。结论我们的研究表明,一般人群中的AHL相对普遍,特别是在男女和老年人的高频范围内。我们的研究表明,职业噪声暴露与混淆后的AHL之间没有关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号