> Reactive and proactive aggression is '/> Reactive and proactive aggression as meaningful distinctions at the variable and person level in primary school‐aged children
首页> 外文期刊>Aggressive behavior: A multidisciplinary journal devoted to the experimental and observational analysis of conflict in humans and animals >Reactive and proactive aggression as meaningful distinctions at the variable and person level in primary school‐aged children
【24h】

Reactive and proactive aggression as meaningful distinctions at the variable and person level in primary school‐aged children

机译:在小学生儿童的可变和人员水平上是有意义的和积极的侵略在初级学龄儿童中的有意义区分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

> Reactive and proactive aggression is a dichotomous classification of aggression in adults and children. This distinction has been supported by a number of variable‐based and factor analytic studies. Due to high inter‐correlations, however, the reactive—proactive aggression distinction may not be entirely useful for understanding how group or individual aggressive behavior varies in children and adolescents. Drawing on a sample of primary school‐aged children ( N ?=?242) aged 7–12 years, this study sought to determine whether reactive and proactive aggression could be distinguished at the variable‐level and the person‐level in children. Exploratory Factor Analysis of data from an aggression instrument measuring both functions and forms of aggression, found a two‐factor construct of aggression constituted by a reactive and proactive aggression factor. A person‐based analysis was then conducted after classifying children according to the presence of reactive and/or proactive aggression. Discriminant function analysis was used to discern whether classifications on the basis of aggression function produced meaningful distinctions in terms of antisocial traits and emotional valence and intensity measures. Two functions were identified which distinguished children with different combinations of reactive and proactive aggression. Reactive‐only aggressive children were defined primarily by high levels of impulsivity, while proactive‐only children were defined primarily by higher levels of antisocial traits. Children high in both types of aggression exhibited both the presence of antisocial traits and impulsivity. Contrary to recent findings, this suggests that differences in aggression functions remain meaningful at the person level in children. Implications for intervention
机译:
>反应性和积极侵略性是成人和儿童侵略的二分法分类。这一区分得到了许多基于可变的和因子分析研究的支持。然而,由于高相互作用,反应性积极的侵略区分可能并不完全有用,以了解群体或个体侵略性行为如何在儿童和青少年中变化。绘制在7-12岁的小学生儿童样本( n ?=?242),这项研究试图确定是否可以在可变级别和中区区分反应性和积极的侵略孩子们的人。来自侵略性仪器术语和侵蚀形式的侵略性仪器数据的探索性因子分析,发现了由反应性和积极的侵略因子构成的双因素构建。然后根据反应性和/或积极侵略的存在,在分类儿童后进行基于人的分析。判别函数分析用于辨别是否基于侵略函数的分类,从反社会特征和情绪化价和强度措施方面产生了有意义的区别。确定了两种功能,其中具有不同组合的反应性和积极性侵略性的尊敬。仅限反应性侵略性儿童主要由高水平的冲动定义,而仅仅受到更高水平的反社会性状,才能定义唯一的儿童。两种类型的侵略中的儿童都表现出反社会性状和冲动的存在。与最近的发现相反,这表明侵略性职能的差异对儿童的人员仍然有意义。对干预的影响

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号