首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia: Journal of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland >Nitrous oxide‐based vs. nitrous oxide‐free general anaesthesia and accidental awareness in surgical patients: an abridged Cochrane systematic review
【24h】

Nitrous oxide‐based vs. nitrous oxide‐free general anaesthesia and accidental awareness in surgical patients: an abridged Cochrane systematic review

机译:氧化二氮氧化物的氧化二氮的全身麻醉和手术患者的意外意识:伸缩的Cochrane系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Summary Accidental awareness during general anaesthesia can arise from a failure to deliver sufficient anaesthetic agent, or from a patient's resistance to an expected sufficient dose of such an agent. Awareness is ‘explicit’ if the patient is subsequently able to recall the event. We conducted a systematic review into the effect of nitrous oxide used as part of a general anaesthetic on the risk of accidental awareness in people over the age of five years undergoing general anaesthesia for surgery. We included 15 randomised controlled trials, 14 of which, representing a total of 3439 participants, were included in our primary analysis of the frequency of accidental awareness events. The awareness incidence rate was rare within these studies, and all were considered underpowered with respect to this outcome. The risk of bias across all studies was judged to be high, and 76% of studies failed adequately to conceal participant allocation. We considered the available evidence to be of very poor quality. There were a total of three accidental awareness events reported in two studies, one of which reported that the awareness was the result of a kink in a propofol intravenous line. There were insufficient data to conduct a meta‐ or sub‐group analysis and there was insufficient evidence to draw outcome‐related conclusions. We can, however, recommend that future studies focus on potentially high‐risk groups such as obstetric or cardiac surgery patients, or those receiving neuromuscular blocking drugs or total intravenous anaesthesia.
机译:发明内容在全身麻醉期间意外意识可能因未能提供足够的麻醉剂,或从患者的抗性到预期的足够剂量的这种药剂而产生。如果患者随后能够回忆起事件,则意识是“显式”。我们对氧化亚氮的一部分进行了系统的综述,作为一般麻醉的一部分,就是在五年内遭受的全身麻醉患者进行手术的意外意外意识的风险。我们包括15项随机对照试验,其中14项,其中14项,总共有3439名参与者,包括在我们对意外意识事件频率的主要分析中。在这些研究中,意识发病率罕见,所有人都被认为是对这一结果的支持。判断所有研究的偏见风险很高,76%的研究失败了解参与者分配。我们认为可用证据具有非常差的质量。两项研究中报告了三项意外的意外意识事件,其中一个人报告说,意识是异丙酚静脉线中扭结的结果。有足够的数据来进行元或小组分析,并且没有足够的证据来吸引与结果相关的结论。但是,我们可以建议未来的研究重点关注产科或心脏手术患者等潜在的高风险群体,或接受神经肌肉阻断药物或总静脉内麻醉的群体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号