首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia: Journal of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland >Supraglottic airway devices in difficult airway management: a retrospective cohort study of 658,104 general anaesthetics registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Database
【24h】

Supraglottic airway devices in difficult airway management: a retrospective cohort study of 658,104 general anaesthetics registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Database

机译:在困难的气道管理中的起峰气道装置:丹麦麻醉数据库中注册的658,104普通麻醉品的回顾性队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Indications for using supraglottic airway devices have widened over time and they now hold a prominent role in guidelines for difficult airway management. We aimed to describe the use of supraglottic airway devices in difficult airway management. We included adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Database from 2008 to 2012 whose airway management had been recorded as difficult, defined as: = 3 tracheal intubation attempts; failed tracheal intubation; or difficult facemask ventilation. In the Danish Anaesthesia Database, a separate difficult airway management module requires the technique used in each successive airway management attempt to be recorded. The primary aim of the study was to describe the use of supraglottic airway devices in cases of difficult airway management. Secondary aims were to examine success rates of supraglottic airway devices in difficult airway management cases, and specifically in the cases of cannot intubate, cannot facemask ventilate'. Difficult airway management occurred in 4898 (0.74% (95% CI 0.72-0.76%)) of 658,104 records of general anaesthesia. Supraglottic airway devices were used or use was attempted in 607 cases of difficult airway management (12.4% (95% CI 11.5-13.3%)), and were successful in 395 (65.1% (95% CI 61.2-68.8%)) cases. In 'cannot intubate, cannot facemask ventilate' situations, supraglottic airway devices were used in 86 (18.9% (95% CI 15.6-22.8%)) of 455 records and were successful in 54 (62.8% (95% CI 52.2-72.3%)) cases. We found that supraglottic airway devices are not widely used in the management of the difficult airway despite their prominent role in difficult airway management guidelines.
机译:使用Suprottic Airway设备的适应症随着时间的推移而扩大,现在他们在困难的气道管理准则中占据了突出作用。我们的旨在描述在困难的气道管理中使用Suprottic Airway设备。我们包括从2008年到2012年在丹麦麻醉数据库中注册的一般麻醉的成年患者,其气道管理已被记录为困难,定义为:& = 3次气管插管尝试;气管插管失败;或困难的面罩通风。在丹麦麻醉数据库中,一个单独的困难的气道管理模块要求记录每个连续的航空器管理尝试的技术。该研究的主要目标是描述在困难气道管理的情况下使用Suprottic气道装置。次要目标是在困难的气道管理案例中检查Suprottic气道设备的成功率,特别是在无法插管的情况下,不能面向通风'。 4898年发生困难的气道管理(0.74%(95%(95%CI 0.72-0.76%),总麻醉的658,104条。使用超凡透视气道装置或使用607例困难气道管理(12.4%(95%CI11.5-13.3%)的情况下使用,并在395年成功(65.1%(95%CI 61.2-68.8%))病例。在“无法插管,不能面上通风”情况,86次使用副普通气道装置(18.9%(95%(95%CI 15.6-22.8%))455条记录,成功54名(62.8%(95%CI 52.2-72.3%) ))案件。我们发现,尽管在困难的气道管理指南中突出了突出的作用,但副普拉塔科航空公司在困难的气道管理中不广泛应用于困难的气道。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号