...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of transplantation: official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons >Liver transplantation and waitlist mortality for HCC and non-HCC candidates following the 2015 HCC exception policy change
【24h】

Liver transplantation and waitlist mortality for HCC and non-HCC candidates following the 2015 HCC exception policy change

机译:2015年HCC异常政策变更后HCC和非HCC候选人的肝移植和候补人民死亡率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Historically, exception points for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) led to higher transplant rates and lower waitlist mortality for HCC candidates compared to non-HCC candidates. As of October 2015, HCC candidates must wait 6months after initial application to obtain exception points; the impact of this policy remains unstudied. Using 2013-2017 SRTR data, we identified 39 350 adult, first-time, active waitlist candidates and compared deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) rates and waitlist mortality/dropout for HCC versus non-HCC candidates before (October 8, 2013-October 7, 2015, prepolicy) and after (October 8, 2015-October 7, 2017, postpolicy) the policy change using Cox and competing risks regression, respectively. Compared to non-HCC candidates with the same calculated MELD, HCC candidates had a 3.6-fold higher rate of DDLT prepolicy (aHR=(3.49) 3.69 (3.89)) and a 2.2-fold higher rate of DDLT postpolicy (aHR=(2.09) 2.21 (2.34)). Compared to non-HCC candidates with the same allocation priority, HCC candidates had a 37% lower risk of waitlist mortality/dropout prepolicy (asHR=(0.54) 0.63 (0.73)) and a comparable risk of mortality/dropout postpolicy (asHR=(0.81) 0.95 (1.11)). Following the policy change, the DDLT advantage for HCC candidates remained, albeit dramatically attenuated, without any substantial increase in waitlist mortality/dropout. In the context of sickest-first liver allocation, the revised policy seems to have established allocation equity for HCC and non-HCC candidates.
机译:从历史上看,与非HCC候选者相比,肝细胞癌(HCC)的例外点导致了HCC候选的更高的移植率和较低的候补性死亡率。截至2015年10月,HCC候选人必须在初次申请后等待6个月以获得异常点;这项政策的影响仍然不孤立。使用2013-2017 SRTR数据,我们确定了39个成人,首次,活跃的候补候选人,并比较了死者的捐赠者肝脏移植(DDLT)率和HCC与非HCC候选人(2013年10月8日)之前的HCC与非HCC候选人7,2015,Prepolicy)和(2015年10月8日 - 2017年10月7日,Postpolicy)分别使用Cox和竞争风险回归的政策改变。与具有相同计算的融合的非HCC候选,HCC候选率为3.6倍的DDLT预接钙(AHR =(3.49)3.69(3.89))和DDLT PORTPOLICY的2.2倍以下的速率(AHR =(2.09 )2.21(2.34))。与具有相同分配优先权的非HCC候选者相比,候补候选者的候补候选者的候补性候选人较低的37%越来越低37%的候补人数/辍学预算(ASHR =(0.54)0.63(0.73))和死亡率/辍学后的相当风险(ASHR =( 0.81)0.95(1.11))。在政策变化之后,HCC候选人的DDLT优势仍然存在,尽管有显着减弱,但候补人民死亡率/辍学的任何大幅增加。在第一次肝脏分配的背景下,修订后的政策似乎已经确定了HCC和非HCC候选人的拨款权益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号