首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Epidemiology >How Accurate Is a Single Cutpoint to Identify High Blood Pressure in Adolescents?
【24h】

How Accurate Is a Single Cutpoint to Identify High Blood Pressure in Adolescents?

机译:单个切口有多准确,以识别青少年的高血压?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In 2007 the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) proposed single blood pressure (BP) cutpoints (systolic: >= 130 mm Hg and diastolic: >= 85 mm Hg) for the diagnosis of high blood pressure (HBP) in adolescents. Before this proposal, HBP had been defined as BP at or above the 95th percentile for age, sex, and height percentile (reference standard). In this study, we evaluated the risk for misclassification when using the IDF single-cutpoints criteria. We first applied the IDF criteria to a reconstructed population with the same age, sex, and height distribution as the population used to develop the reference standard. The proposed single cutpoints corresponded to percentiles from the 81.6th to 99.9th for systolic BP and from the 92.9th to 98.9th for diastolic BP in the reconstructed population. Using IDF criteria, there were high false-negative fractions for both systolic and diastolic BP (from 54% to 93%) in 10-to 12-year-olds and a false-positive fraction up to 35% in older subjects. We then applied the IDF criteria to 1,162 overweight/obese adolescents recruited during 1998-2000 from pediatric clinical centers in Milano, Varese, and Modena in Italy and in Zaragoza, Spain. Overall false-negative and false-positive fractions were 22% and 2%, respectively; negative predictive values were especially low for 10-to 12-year-old subjects. The use of IDF's single cutpoints carries a high risk of misclassification, mostly due to false negatives in younger subjects. The effort to simplify diagnosis could be overcome by the risk of undiagnosed HBP.
机译:2007年,国际糖尿病联合会(IDF)提出了单血压(BP)切口点(收缩液:> = 130毫米Hg和舒张:> = 85mm Hg),用于诊断青少年高血压(HBP)。在此提案之前,HBP已被定义为年龄,性别和身高百分位数(参考标准)的95百分位数或高于第95百分位数的BP。在这项研究中,我们在使用IDF单切口点标准时评估了错误分类的风险。我们首先将IDF标准应用于具有相同年龄,性别和高度分布的重建人口,因为用于开发参考标准的人口。所提出的单切口点对应于收缩性BP的81.6至99.9和92.9至98.9中的百分比。重建群体中的舒张性BP为92.9至98.9。使用IDF标准,在10至12岁的子宫内(54%至93%)和较老体受试者的假阳性分数高出35%的假阴性分数。然后,我们将IDF标准应用于1998 - 2000年的1,162个超重/肥胖青少年,从Milano,Varese和Modena在西班牙萨拉戈萨举行的儿科临床中心招募。总体假阴性和假阳性级分别分别为22%和2%;对于10至12岁题的受试者,否定预测值特别低。使用IDF的单切口点具有很高的错误分类风险,主要是由于较年轻的受试者的错误否定。可以通过未确诊的HBP的风险来克服简化诊断的努力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号