首页> 外文期刊>Current Anthropology: A World Journal of the Sciences of Man >New Brooms and Old Sweeping Up Corruption in India, One Law at a Time
【24h】

New Brooms and Old Sweeping Up Corruption in India, One Law at a Time

机译:新的扫帚和旧扫除印度腐败,一次一法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Arvind Kejriwal is an anti-corruption crusader in India whose technomoral mission is to transform governance through the law, rendering it transparent, noncorrupt, and participatory. He was actively involved in the fight for the Right to Information Act, which became law in 2005. Dissatisfied with the workings of this law, however, Kejriwal organized the India. Against Corruption movement to demand a new anti-corruption bill, which failed to pass. This essay focuses on the public discourse on corruption in the wake of the Right to Information Act and the India Against Corruption movement, and it puts law-focused anti-corruption strategies under critical scrutiny. I reveal the difficulty in delimiting corruption as well as the limits of the law in tackling it. A lack of consensus over what counts as real corruption and where its source lies complicates legal remedies. Indeed, as I argue, the law and corruption are inverted mirrors of each other. Where one is a symbol of rationalized modernity, the other reflects its dangerous underside; where one extends a formal economy of rules, the other refers to unruly practices of rule bending. Corruption transgresses and questions the very dualisms-public and private, state and society that liberal law embodies. If the law produces corruption as a constitutive outside of the modern order, then using laws to dismantle corruption becomes a paradoxical undertaking that is bound to fail at its limits.
机译:Arvind Kejriwal是印度的反腐败十字军,其技术使命是通过法律改变治理,使其透明,非腐败和参与性。他积极参与争取信息法案的争夺,该法案于2005年成为法律。然而,对本法的工作不满意,然而,Kejriwal组织了印度。反对腐败运动要求一个未能通过的新反腐账单。本文侧重于信息法案和印度反对腐败运动的权利,对腐败的公众话语,并在批判性审查下将界定的反腐败策略提出。我揭示了划定腐败的困难以及解决它的法律的限制。缺乏对真正腐败以及其来源的重要性的共识,并使其来源使法律补救措施复杂化。实际上,正如我争辩的那样,法律和腐败是彼此反射的。其中一个是合理化现代性的象征,另一个反映了其危险的下侧;如果一个人延长正式的规则经济,另一个是指规则弯曲的不守规则惯例。腐败违反和质疑自由法案的二元论和私人,州和社会。如果法律产生腐败作为现代顺序之外的构成型,那么使用法律拆除腐败成为一种矛盾的承诺,这些承诺必然会失败。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号