首页> 外文期刊>American journal of therapeutics >Long (> 12 Months) and Short (< 6 Months) Versus Standard Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Long (> 12 Months) and Short (< 6 Months) Versus Standard Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:长(> 12个月)和短(<6个月)与冠状动脉支架后双抗血小板治疗的标准持续时间:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is recommended for 6-12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation to prevent ischemic events and late stent thrombosis. The optimal duration of DAPT has not been established. We performed a meta-analysis of the comparative effects of short and long versus standard duration DAPT duration on adverse cardiovascular and major bleeding. We conducted an EMBASE and MEDLINE search for studies in which patients were randomized to treatment with a different duration of DAPT. We included studies that provided data on DES selection, DAPT regimen and duration, and incidence of the selected endpoints at the end of the follow-up period. We identified 5 prospective randomized studies comparing short versus standard duration DAPT and 3 comparing long versus standard duration DAPT with a total of 28,343 patients. Shortterm DAPT has similar incidence of stent thrombosis, MI, and death compared to standard duration DAPT, whereas major bleeding was significantly lower in short duration DAPT. Long-term DAPT was associated with lower rates of stent thrombosis and MI but significantly increased major bleeding and all-cause mortality compared to standard duration DAPT. In this meta-analysis of prospective controlled studies we found that short duration DAPT is safer and as effective as standard duration DAPT in patients with second-generation DES. Extended DAPT is associated with less ischemic events at the expense of high bleeding and mortality rates.
机译:在药物洗脱支架(DES)植入后6-12个月推荐双抗血小板治疗(DAPT),以防止缺血事件和晚期支架血栓形成。 DAPT的最佳持续时间尚未建立。我们对不良心血管和重大出血进行了短期和长期持续时间DAPT持续时间的比较效应进行了荟萃分析。我们进行了一个突发和Medline寻找研究,其中患者随机随机化以不同的DAPT持续时间进行治疗。我们包括在随访期结束时提供关于DES选择,DAPT方案和持续时间和所选终点的发生率的研究。我们确定了5个预期随机化研究,比较了较短的标准持续时间DAPT和3比较长与标准持续时间DAPT,共28,343名患者。与标准持续时间DAPT相比,短期DAPT与标准持续时间相比,短期血栓形成,MI和死亡率相似,而在短时间内,主要出血显着降低。长期DAPT与支架血栓形成和MI的较低率相关,但与标准持续时间DAPT相比,具有显着增加的重大出血和全导致死亡率。在对前瞻性对照研究的这种荟萃分析中,我们发现短暂的DATP更安全,并且在第二代DES患者中作为标准持续时间DAPT有效。扩展DAPT与较低的缺血事件为代价,高血入和死亡率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号