...
首页> 外文期刊>Aging clinical and experimental research >Behavioral and cognitive markers of mild cognitive impairment: diagnostic value of saccadic eye movements and Simon task
【24h】

Behavioral and cognitive markers of mild cognitive impairment: diagnostic value of saccadic eye movements and Simon task

机译:轻度认知障碍的行为和认知标志:扫视眼动作的诊断价值和西蒙任务

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) has been considered as a prodromal stage of Alzheimer disease (AD). Subtle changes in specific aspects of executive function like inhibitory control have been found in MCI. Aims We examined attentional and inhibitory control with the aim to distinguish between amnestic MCI patients and healthy controls. Method Using neuropsychological, behavioral, and oculomotor function experiments, we examined executive function in 59 normal control, 49, multiple domain amnestic MCI (a-MCI) subjects, and 21 early stage AD patients using eye tracking and Simon task as measures of attentional control, to determine which saccade and behavioral tasks were sensitive enough to identify a-MCI. Saccades were investigated in gap and overlap pro-saccade and anti-saccade tasks. Results Scores on the Simon task were inversely correlated with general cognitive status and can distinguish a-MCI from controls with excellent specificity (AUC = 0.65 for reaction time and 0.59 for false responses). More importantly, our results showed that saccadic gains were affected in a-MCI and were the most sensitive measures to distinguish a-MCI from normal participants AST gap task AUC = 0.7, PST gap task AUC = 0.63, AST overlap task (AUC = 0.73). Moreover, these parameters were strongly correlated with neuropsychological measures. Using tests in parallel model, improved sensitivity up to 0.97. Conclusion The present results enable us to suggest eye tracking along with behavioral data as a possible sensitive tools to detect a-MCI in preclinical stage.
机译:背景技术轻度认知障碍(MCI)被认为是阿尔茨海默病(AD)的产前阶段。在MCI中发现了抑制控制等执行功能的具体方面的细微变化。目的是我们检查了注意力和抑制控制,旨在区分Amnestic MCI患者和健康对照。使用神经心理学,行为和动血功能实验的方法,我们在59例正常控制中检查了执行功能,49名,多域Amnestic MCI(A-MCI)受试者,以及21例早期AD患者,使用眼跟踪和西蒙任务作为注意力控制的措施,确定哪些扫描和行为任务足以敏感以识别A-MCI。在差距和重叠的扫描和反扫视任务中调查了扫视。结果SIMON任务的评分与一般认知状态相反,并且可以将A-MCI与具有优异特异性的控制(AUC = 0.65进行反应时间和0.59的错误反应)。更重要的是,我们的结果表明,扫视率在A-MCI中受到影响,并且是区分A-MCI从正常参与者AST间隙任务AUC = 0.7,PST间隙任务AUC = 0.63,AST重叠任务(AUC = 0.73的最敏感措施)。此外,这些参数与神经心理学措施密切相关。在并行模型中使用测试,提高灵敏度高达0.97。结论本结果使我们能够建议眼睛跟踪以及行为数据作为临床前阶段检测A-MCI的可能敏感工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号