...
首页> 外文期刊>Aging clinical and experimental research >Tools for assessing fall risk in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Tools for assessing fall risk in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:评估老年人风险的工具:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The prevention of falls among the elderly is arguably one of the most important public health issues in today's aging society. The aim of this study was to assess which tools best predict the risk of falls in the elderly. Electronic searches were performed using Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, etc., using the following keywords: "fall risk assessment", "elderly fall screening", and "elderly mobility scale". The QUADAS-2 was applied to assess the internal validity of the diagnostic studies. Selected studies were meta-analyzed with MetaDisc 1.4. A total of 33 studies were eligible out of the 2,321 studies retrieved from selected databases. Twenty-six assessment tools for fall risk were used in the selected articles, and they tended to vary based on the setting. The fall risk assessment tools currently used for the elderly did not show sufficiently high predictive validity for differentiating high and low fall risks. The Berg Balance scale and Mobility Interaction Fall chart showed stable and high specificity, while the Downton Fall Risk Index, Hendrich II Fall Risk Model, St. Thomas's Risk Assessment Tool in Falling elderly inpatients, Timed Up and Go test, and Tinetti Balance scale showed the opposite results. We concluded that rather than a single measure, two assessment tools used together would better evaluate the characteristics of falls by the elderly that can occur due to a multitude of factors and maximize the advantages of each for predicting the occurrence of falls.
机译:预防老年人的贫困人士可以说是当今老龄化社会中最重要的公共卫生问题之一。本研究的目的是评估哪些工具最能预测老年人跌落的风险。使用以下关键词使用Medline,Embase,Cochrane图书馆,CINAHL等进行电子搜索:“秋季风险评估”,“老年人秋季筛选”和“老年移动规模”。 Quadas-2被应用于评估诊断研究的内部有效性。选择的研究与Metadisc 1.4进行了荟萃分析。共有33项研究有资格从选定数据库检索的2,321项研究中。在选定的文章中使用了26个秋季评估工具,他们倾向于根据设置而异。目前用于老年人的秋季风险评估工具并未表现出足够高的预测有效性,以区分高和低降低风险。 BERG平衡规模和移动性互动落地图表表现出稳定和高的特异性,而剧顿II秋季风险模型,圣托马斯的风险评估工具在跌落的老年住院患者,时间上升和去测试,以及TINETTI平衡量表显示相反的结果。我们得出结论,而不是单一的措施,两种评估工具一起使用的评估工具将更好地评估由于多种因素而可能发生的老年人的特点,并最大限度地提高每个用于预测瀑布的发生的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号