首页> 外文期刊>Acta Neurochirurgica >A retrospective study of 113 consecutive cases of surgically treated spondylodiscitis patients. A single-center experience
【24h】

A retrospective study of 113 consecutive cases of surgically treated spondylodiscitis patients. A single-center experience

机译:连续113例经手术治疗的脊椎盘炎患者的回顾性研究。单中心体验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Recommendations for the operative treatment of spondylodiscitis are still a controversial issue. Methods: A retrospective review identified 113 consecutive patients who underwent surgical debridement and instrumentation for spondylodiscitis between 2006 and 2010 at our department. Results: The mean age at presentation was 65 years; 78 patients were male (69 %). Distribution of the inflammation was lumbar in 68 (60 %), thoracic in 19 (17 %) and cervical in 20 (18 %) cases. Six patients (5 %) had two concomitant non-contiguous spondylodiscitis foci in different segments of the spine. Epidural abscess was found in 33 patients (29 %). One hundred four patients (92 %) had pain. Neurological deficit was found in 40 patients (35 %). In the thoracic and lumbar cases, dorsal instrumentation alone was considered sufficient in 26 cases; additional interbody fusion from the posterior was performed in 44 cases. A 360° instrumentation was performed in 22 cases. In the cervical cases, only ventral spondylodesis and plating were performed in eight cases, only dorsal instrumentation in five and 360° instrumentation in seven. Postoperative intravenous antibiotics were administered for 14.4±9.3 (mean ± SD) days followed by 3.2±0.8 (mean ± SD) months of oral antibiosis. Complete healing of the inflammation was achieved in 111 (98 %) cases. Two patients died because of septic shock, both with fulminant endocarditis. Pain resolved in all cases. Neurological deficits were completely resolved in 20 patients, and 14 patients had a partial recovery. Conclusion: The results of our retrospective study show that surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis with a staged surgical approach (if needed) and a short 1-2-week period of intravenous antibiotics followed by 3 months of oral antibiotics is appropriate for most patients in whom conservative treatment has failed or is not advisable. Furthermore, surgical treatment of newly diagnosed spondylodiscitis might be recommended as an initial treatment option in many cases. Thereby the choice of fusion material (autologous bone, titanium, PEEK) seems less important.
机译:背景:关于脊椎盘炎的手术治疗建议仍是一个有争议的问题。方法:回顾性研究确定了我科2006年至2010年间连续113例行脊柱椎间盘炎清创术和器械检查的患者。结果:演讲的平均年龄为65岁。男性78例(69%)。炎症的分布是腰部68例(60%),胸腔19例(17%),颈椎20例(18%)。六名患者(5%)在脊柱的不同部位有两个并发的非连续性脊椎炎。 33例(29%)发现硬膜外脓肿。一百零四名患者(92%)有疼痛感。 40名患者(35%)发现神经功能缺损。在胸椎和腰椎病例中,仅26例被认为仅使用背侧器械即可。从后方进行额外的椎间融合治疗44例。在22例中进行了360°仪器检查。在宫颈病例中,仅在8例中进行了腹侧脊椎固定术和钢板,在5例中仅进行了背侧器械,在7例中仅进行了360°器械。术后静脉给予抗生素14.4±9.3(平均±SD)天,然后口服3.2±0.8(平均±SD)个月。在111(98%)例中,炎症得以完全治愈。 2例患者因败血性休克死亡,均伴有暴发性心内膜炎。在所有情况下疼痛都得到解决。 20例患者的神经功能缺损得到完全解决,其中14例患者部分恢复。结论:我们的回顾性研究结果表明,对于大多数保守的患者,采用分阶段手术方法(如果需要)和较短的1-2周静脉注射抗生素,然后口服3个月口服抗生素治疗脊椎疾病治疗失败或不建议。此外,在许多情况下,可能会建议对新诊断的脊椎盘炎进行手术治疗作为初始治疗选择。因此,融合材料(自体骨,钛,PEEK)的选择似乎不太重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号