首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Perinatology >Effect of Body Position on Energy Expenditure of Preterm Infants as Determined by Simultaneous Direct and Indirect Calorimetry
【24h】

Effect of Body Position on Energy Expenditure of Preterm Infants as Determined by Simultaneous Direct and Indirect Calorimetry

机译:通过同时直接和间接量热法测定,身体位置对早产儿能耗的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Indirect calorimetry is the standard method for estimating energy expenditure in clinical research. Few studies have evaluated indirect calorimetry in infants by comparing it with simultaneous direct calorimetry. Our purpose was (1) to compare the energy expenditure of preterm infants determined by these two methods, direct calorimetry and indirect calorimetry; and (2) to examine the effect of body position, supine or prone, on energy expenditure. Study Design We measured energy expenditure by simultaneous direct (heat loss by gradient-layer calorimeter corrected for heat storage) and indirect calorimetry (whole body oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production) in 15 growing preterm infants during two consecutive interfeeding intervals, once in the supine position and once in the prone position. Results The mean energy expenditure for all measurements in both positions did not differ significantly by the method used: 2.82 (standard deviation [SD] 0.42) kcal/kg/h by direct calorimetry and 2.78 (SD 0.48) kcal/kg/h by indirect calorimetry. The energy expenditure was significantly lower, by 10%, in the prone than in the supine position, whether examined by direct calorimetry (2.67 vs. 2.97 kcal/kg/h, p < 0.001) or indirect calorimetry (2.64 vs. 2.92 kcal/kg/h, p = 0.017). Conclusion Direct calorimetry and indirect calorimetry gave similar estimates of energy expenditure. Energy expenditure was 10% lower in the prone position than in the supine position.
机译:背景技术间接量热法是估算临床研究中能源消耗的标准方法。通过将其与同时直接量热法进行比较,少量研究评估了婴儿的间接量热法。我们的目的是(1)以比较这两种方法,直接量热和间接量热法测定的早产儿的能源支出; (2)检查身体位置,仰卧或容易发生的效果对能源支出。研究设计我们通过同时直接(通过梯度层热量计进行热量损失来测量能源支出,并且在两个连续的间隔间隔内15个生长的早产儿(全身氧气消耗和二氧化碳生产)的间接量热法(全身氧消耗和二氧化碳生产),一次在仰卧处位置和一次在俯卧位。结果使用的方法(标准偏差[SD] 0.42)KCAL / kg / h通过直接量热法和间接间接的情况下,两个位置中所有测量的平均能量支出没有显着差异。量热法。在俯卧位于仰卧位,无论是通过直接量热法检查(2.67对2.97 kcal / kg / h,p <0.001)或间接量热法(2.64对2.92 kcal / kg / h,p = 0.017)。结论直接量热法和间接量热法发出了类似的能源支出估计。在俯卧位的能量支出比仰卧位下降10%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号