首页> 外文期刊>Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. >Switching from infliximab innovator to biosimilar in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a 12‐month multicentre observational prospective cohort study
【24h】

Switching from infliximab innovator to biosimilar in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a 12‐month multicentre observational prospective cohort study

机译:从炎症性肠病患者中从英夫利昔单抗创新者转换为生物素线:一个12个月的多长期观测前瞻性队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Summary Background Infliximab biosimilars have become available for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease ( IBD ). However, data showing long‐term safety and effectiveness of biosimilars in IBD patients are limited. Aim To study prospectively the switch from infliximab innovator to biosimilar in an IBD cohort with 12?months follow‐up to evaluate safety and effectiveness. Methods Adult IBD patients from two hospitals treated with infliximab innovator (Remicade; Janssen Biotech, ?Horsham?, ?Pennsylvania, USA) were switched to infliximab biosimilar (Inflectra; Hospira, Lake Forest, Illinois, USA) as part of routine care, but in a controlled setting. Blood samples were taken just before the first, second, fourth and seventh infusion of biosimilar. Infliximab trough levels, antibodies‐to‐infliximab ( ATI ), CRP and ESR were measured and disease activity scores were calculated. Results Our cohort consisted of 133 IBD patients (64% CD , 36% UC ). Before switching we found widely varying infliximab levels (median 3.5?μg/ mL ). ATI were detected in eight patients (6%). Most patients were in remission or had mild disease ( CD : 82% UC : 90%). After switching to biosimilar, 35 patients (26%) discontinued therapy within 12?months, mostly due to subjective higher disease activity (9%) and adverse events ( AE , 9.8%). AE included general malaise/fatigue (n?=?7), arthralgia (n?=?2), skin problems (n?=?2) and infusion reactions (n?=?2). No differences in IFX levels, CRP , and disease activity scores were found between the four time points ( P? ≥?.0917). Conclusions We found no differences in drug levels and disease activity between infliximab innovator and biosimilar in our IBD cohort, indicating that biosimilars are safe and effective. The high proportions of discontinuers were mostly due to elective withdrawal or subjective disease worsening.
机译:发明内容背景生物纤维单纤维单体可用于治疗炎性肠病(IBD)。然而,显示IBD患者中生物仿制性的长期安全性和有效性的数据有限。目的旨在前瞻性地研究了IBD队列中的inciximab Innovator的切换,12?几个月随访,以评估安全和有效性。方法采用incriximab创新者治疗的两家医院的成人IBD患者(犹豫不决; janssen biotech,?Horsham?,Usa)被切换到英夫利昔单抗生物素(富峰;医院;医院,森林,伊利诺伊州,美国)作为常规护理的一部分,但在受控设置中。血液样本在BioSimilar的第一,第二,第四和第七次输注之前采用。测量英夫利昔单抗水平,抗体抗体,CRP和ESR,并计算疾病活动评分。结果我们的队列由133名IBD患者(64%CD,36%UC)组成。在切换之前,我们发现广泛不同的英夫利昔单抗水平(中位数3.5?μg/ ml)。在8名患者中检测到ATI(6%)。大多数患者处于缓解或轻度疾病(CD:82%:90%)。切换到生物仿制率后,35名患者(26%)在12月12日内停产治疗,主要是由于主观更高的疾病活动(9%)和不良事件(AE,9.8%)。 AE包括一般恶性/疲劳(n?=Δ7),关节痛(n?=Δ2),皮肤问题(n?=Δ2)和输注反应(n?=?2)。在四个时间点之间发现IFX水平,CRP和疾病活动评分没有差异(P?≥?.0917)。结论我们发现IBD队列中英夫利昔单抗创新者和生物仿生之间的药物水平和疾病活动差异,表明生物仿制性是安全可有效的。高比例的中断人员主要是由于选择性戒断或主观疾病恶化。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Clinical LaboratoryMáxima Medical CenterVeldhoven The Netherlands;

    Department of GastroenterologyMáxima Medical CenterEindhoven and Veldhoven The Netherlands;

    Department of GastroenterologyMáxima Medical CenterEindhoven and Veldhoven The Netherlands;

    Department of Clinical PharmacyElkerliek HospitalHelmond The Netherlands;

    Expert Center Clinical ChemistryEindhoven The Netherlands;

    Expert Center Clinical ChemistryEindhoven The Netherlands;

    Department of Clinical Pharmacy and PharmacologyMáxima Medical CenterVeldhoven The Netherlands;

    Clinical LaboratoryMáxima Medical CenterVeldhoven The Netherlands;

    Department of Clinical Pharmacy and PharmacologyMáxima Medical CenterVeldhoven The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 药理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号