...
首页> 外文期刊>BioTechniques >Microsatellite allele sizing: Difference between automated capillary electrophoresis and manual technique
【24h】

Microsatellite allele sizing: Difference between automated capillary electrophoresis and manual technique

机译:微卫星等位基因的大小:自动毛细管电泳和手动技术之间的区别

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

By comparing data collected with different automated sequencers and a manual technique (fragment separation in a silver-stained polyacrylamide gel), we found strong discrepancies in allele size of microsatellite loci. To quantify the sizing bias generated by automated capillary electrophoresis, we typed 51 alleles at seven loci and found that differences between actual (manual) and called (automated) sizing were inversely related to locus size. This result seems independent of the fluorescent dye but might be due to different migration patterns of the size standard and the microsatellite loci. Thus, it is essential to distinguish between actual (that can only be confirmed by Sequencing) and called (obtained with automated sequencer) allele sizes. To enable the comparison of data collected by different laboratories on different instruments, the greatest attention should be paid to material and protocol descriptions used for allele sizing, and reference standard DATA genotypes should be shared between collaborating laboratories. Without these precautions, scoring errors in allele size might result in important misleading conclusions.
机译:通过比较用不同的自动测序仪和手动技术(在银染的聚丙烯酰胺凝胶中的片段分离)收集的数据,我们发现微卫星基因座的等位基因大小存在很大差异。为了量化自动毛细管电泳产生的上浆偏倚,我们在七个位点输入了51个等位基因,发现实际(手动)和称为(自动)上浆之间的差异与基因座大小成反比。该结果似乎与荧光染料无关,但可能是由于大小标准品和微卫星基因座的迁移方式不同。因此,必须区分实际(只能通过测序确认)和被称为(通过自动定序器获得)等位基因大小。为了能够比较不同实验室在不同仪器上收集的数据,应最大程度地注意用于等位基因分型的材料和方案描述,并且合作实验室之间应共享参考标准DATA基因型。如果没有这些预防措施,等位基因大小的评分错误可能会导致重要的误导性结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号