首页> 外文期刊>Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment >From community-based to locally led adaptation: Evidence from Vanuatu
【24h】

From community-based to locally led adaptation: Evidence from Vanuatu

机译:从社区为基础的基于局部LED适应:来自瓦努阿图的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Green Climate Fund, donors, governments and non-governmental organisations, among others, are pouring vast amounts of financial and human capital into community-based adaptation across the developing world. The underlying premise is that the world's majority-who have the minority of financial capital-are living on the margins and are the most vulnerable and at risk from climate change. Such a reality, coupled with a deficit understanding of the majority world, is resulting in significant implications for how the 'adaptation industry' (those that fund, design and implement projects) go about their work. Drawing on research evaluating 15 community-based adaptation projects in Vanuatu we found that despite genuine attempts, projects invariably fell short of success, longevity and sustainability. We argue that the indifferent, albeit variable, success of most projects is attributable to the construction of the geographical scale of 'community-based' and the deficit view flowing down to the 'community' through hubris policy, funding guidelines and individual implementers. Our findings show that 'experts' are working in Pacific communities, conducting assessments that involve asking what 'community' needs are, going away to design projects, coming back and implementing projects, which communities are inevitably challenged to sustain once funding has ceased. We postulate that these limitations stem from such a formation of adaptation work that pejoratively fails to see Pacific Islanders in situ as the best litmus test of their own agendas, needs, aspirations and futures and in the best position to make decisions for themselves about what and how they might become more resilient. We claim from a growing body of evidence and new frontiers in research that, rather than adaptation being 'community-based', it needs to be 'locally led', not limited to 'communities', and should take place across different entry points and incorporate, as appropriate, elements of autonomous/Indigenous peoples ownership.
机译:绿色气候基金,捐助者,政府和非政府组织等,倾向于在发展中国家的社区适应范围内倾倒大量的金融和人力资本。潜在的前提是,世界的多数人 - 少数金融资本 - 生活在边缘,是气候变化最脆弱的,风险最脆弱。与对多数世界的赤字理解相结合的这种现实导致“适应行业”(基金,设计和实施项目的适应行业)如何实现显着影响。借鉴瓦努阿图的15个社区适应项目的研究我们发现,尽管是真正的尝试,但项目总是缺乏成功,长寿和可持续性。我们认为,大多数项目的无动于衷,虽然变量,但大多数项目的成功都是归因于建设“以社区为基础”的地理规模和流动到“社区”的赤字视图,通过弘鲁里斯政策,资助准则和个人实施者。我们的研究结果表明,“专家”在太平洋社区工作,涉及涉及询问“社区”的需求的评估,留出设计项目,退出和实施项目,该社区不可避免地挑战,一旦资金已经停止。我们假设这些限制源于这种适应工作的形成,即Pejory地未能看到太平洋岛民原位作为自己的议程,需求,愿望和期货的最佳利维斯测试,以及为自己做出决定的最佳职位它们如何变得更加有弹性。我们从越来越多的证据和新领域声称,而不是适应“基于社区”,它需要“当地领导”,不仅限于“社区”,而且应该跨越不同的入口点举行酌情纳入自主/土着人民所有权的元素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号