...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Economics Research Review >Trade-off between risk and returns in farmers' choice of crops? Evidence from India
【24h】

Trade-off between risk and returns in farmers' choice of crops? Evidence from India

机译:风险与农民作物选择之间的权衡? 来自印度的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper has assessed variation in the exposure and vulnerability of crops to production risks such as droughts, floods and pests; and subsequently the trade-off between risk and returns in fanners' choice of crops. Findings show that, at any pointof time, about one-third of the farm households are exposed to production risks and suffer a loss of about 12% in their potential farm returns. Drought accounts for about 47% of the total loss, followed by insect-pests (27%) and floods (20%). There is aconsiderable variation in exposure and vulnerability of crops to drought risk, but not much to flood and pest risks. The low-risk crops, mainly staple cereals, generate less but stable returns, and the crops that are more remunerative to produce are alsomore vulnerable to risks. In general, we find that risk-averse farmers choose low-return, low-risk crop portfolio, but those capable of bearing the cost of risks prefer a high-return, high-risk crop portfolio.
机译:本文评估了农作物暴露和脆弱性的变化,以生产风险,如干旱,洪水和害虫; 随后,风险之间的权衡和粉丝选择作物的回报。 调查结果表明,在任何时候,大约三分之一的农户都暴露于生产风险,并在潜在的农场回报中遭受约12%的损失。 干旱占总损失的约47%,其次是昆虫害虫(27%)和洪水(20%)。 对洪水风险的农作物的暴露和脆弱性有可能发生不可渗透性和脆弱性,但对洪水和害虫风险并不多。 低风险作物,主要是短纤维,产生较少但稳定的回报,以及更加恢复生产的作物是群体容易受风险。 一般来说,我们发现风险厌恶农民选择低回报,低风险的作物组合,但能够承受风险成本的人更喜欢高返回的高风险作物组合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号