首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural and Forest Meteorology >Partitioning evapotranspiration of a drip-irrigated wheat crop: Inter-comparing eddy covariance-, sap flow-, lysimeter- and FAO-based methods
【24h】

Partitioning evapotranspiration of a drip-irrigated wheat crop: Inter-comparing eddy covariance-, sap flow-, lysimeter- and FAO-based methods

机译:滴灌的小麦作物的分区蒸发:互相协方差,SAP流量,Lysimeter和基于粮农组织的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A precise estimate of the evapotranspiration (ET) partitioning is fundamental for determining the crop water needs and optimizing irrigation management. The plant transpiration (T) is generally considered to be the most desirable component, while reducing the soil evaporation (E) could be one of the most important water-saving actions in semi-arid agricultural regions. Given the lack of reference method to estimate the E/T partitioning of wheat crop, this study inter-compares four different methods based on eddy covariance, sap flow and lysimetry measurements and FAO modeling. The objectives are: i) to quantify the systematic and random uncertainty in E and T observations, ii) to evaluate the partitioning ratio (T/ET) at the daily/field scale and iii) to assess the performance of the FAO model over two drip irrigated wheat fields. Results indicate that despite the small surface sensed by mini-lysimeters, the partitioning ratio is evaluated more precisely (19% relative error) with lysimetry than with the other systems (any combination of eddy covariance, lysimetry and sap flow measurements). Moreover, stem-scale T measurements from sap flow sensors are subject to representativeness issues at the field scale, and to systematic errors during water-stress and senescence periods. The lysimeter-derived partitioning ratio increases from about 0.50 to 0.85 during the growth stage and rapidly drops towards 0 during senescence. Its dynamics is found to be significantly correlated (R & 0.7) with the 5-cm soil moisture. By comparing FAO simulations with observations, it is found that the FAO method overestimates T and underestimates E, while keeping satisfying ET estimates for drip irrigated wheat. This study suggests that different independent measurement techniques should be implemented to both quantify and reduce uncertainties in the T/ET ratio, and that accurate observations are still needed to improve the modeling of E/T components.
机译:精确估计蒸散蒸腾(et)分区是确定作物水需求和优化灌溉管理的基础。植物蒸腾(T)通常被认为是最期望的组分,同时降低土壤蒸发(E)可能是半干旱农业区域中最重要的节水行动之一。鉴于缺乏参考方法来估算小麦作物的E / T分区,本研究相互比较了基于涡流协方差,SAP流和Lysimetry测量和粮农组织建模的四种不同方法。目的是:i)通过e和t观察中的系统和随机的不确定性,ii)评估日常/场比例和iii的分区比率(t / et),以评估粮农组织模型的性能滴灌麦田。结果表明,尽管通过迷你型计感测量的表面感测,但是与Lysimetry更精确地评​​估分配比率而不是与其他系统(涡旋协方差,Lysimetry和SAP流量测量的任何组合)。此外,来自SAP流动传感器的茎级T测量在现场比例下进行了代表性问题,并在水力应激和衰老时段期间进行系统误差。溶血度计衍生的分区比在生长阶段期间增加约0.50至0.85,并且在衰老期间迅速落到0。发现其动态与5厘米的土壤水分有显着相关(R& 0.7)。通过将粮农组织模拟与观察结果进行比较,发现粮农组织方法高估了T并低估了e,同时保持令人满意的ET估算滴灌小麦。本研究表明,应对不同的独立测量技术进行量化和降低T / ET比中的不确定性,并且仍然需要准确的观察来改善E / T组分的建模​​。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号