...
首页> 外文期刊>Addiction >Nicotine delivery and users’ reactions to Juul compared with cigarettes and other e‐cigarette products
【24h】

Nicotine delivery and users’ reactions to Juul compared with cigarettes and other e‐cigarette products

机译:尼古丁交付和用户对Juul的反应与香烟和其他电子烟产品相比

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Aims To assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of, and users’ reactions to, Juul (59?mg nicotine/ml) as an indication of its therapeutic and dependence potential. Design Cross‐over, within‐subjects study in which participants attended after overnight abstinence on separate sessions and smoked a cigarette or used Juul or eight other types of e‐cigarettes (EC) ad libitum for 5?minutes. The Juul product used was the version available in the United States that has more nicotine in the e‐liquid than the one available in the European Union. Setting Laboratory setting in the United Kingdom. Participants Twenty dual users (smokers who also vape) provided data on Juul and cigarettes, with eight also providing data on other EC products. Measurements At each session, number of puffs taken was counted during the 5‐minute product use period and blood samples were taken at baseline and at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 30?minutes after starting smoking/vaping and analysed for nicotine. Participants also monitored their urges to smoke and rated the products on a range of characteristics. Findings Juul's PK profile was close to the PK profile of cigarettes [maximum concentration (C max ) = 20.4 versus 19.2 ng/ml; time to maximum concentration (T max ) = 4 versus 6 minutes; area under the curve (AUC): 307.9 versus 312.6, respectively]. Compared with other EC products, Juul had shorter T max [4 minutes, (IQR = 2.5–4.0) versus 6.3 minutes, (IQR = 4.7 – 8.1), P = 0.012] and higher C max (28.9 (SD = 15.6) versus 10.6 (SD = 5.5), P = 0.013) despite a lower number of puffs (12.5 (SD = 4.2) versus 17.0 (SD = 4.2), P = 0.084). Compared with other e‐cigarette products, it also provided faster reduction of urges to smoke and obtained more favourable subjective ratings. Conclusion Juul's PK profile and user ratings suggest that it could be more effective than other EC products in helping smokers to quit smoking, but it may also have a higher potential to generate regular use in non‐smokers.
机译:摘要旨在评估和用户反应的药代动力学(PK)型材,以及其治疗性和依赖潜力的指示。设计交叉,内部学习内容,其中参与者在单独的会话上过夜禁欲后参加,并熏制了一支香烟或使用的juul或其他八种其他类型的电子卷烟(ec)AD Libitum 5?分钟。使用的JUUL产品是美国的版本,在E-Lift中具有比欧盟可用的尼古丁更多的尼古丁。在英国设定实验室环境。与会者二十二人用户(也Vape的吸烟者)提供了关于Juul和卷烟的数据,其中八个也在其他EC产品上提供数据。每次会议的测量,在5分钟的产品使用期间拍摄的粉扑数量,血液样本在基线和2,4,6,8,10和30.开始吸烟/呕吐后分析并分析尼古丁。参与者还监测他们的兴奋,并在一系列特征上进行吸烟和评分产品。调查结果Juul's PK型材接近香烟的PK轮廓[最大浓度(C max)= 20.4与19.2 ng / ml;最大浓度的时间(t max)= 4与6分钟;曲线下的面积(AUC):307.9分别为312.6。与其他EC产品相比,Juul的T Max [4分钟,(IQR = 2.5-4.0)与6.3分钟,(IQR = 4.7 - 8.1),P = 0.012]和更高的C MAX(28.9(SD = 15.6)与10.6(SD = 5.5),P = 0.013)尽管粉扑数量较少(12.5(SD = 4.2)而不是17.0(SD = 4.2),P = 0.084)。与其他电子卷烟产品相比,它还提供了更快的减少呼吸烟雾,并获得更有利的主观评分。结论JUUL的PK简介和用户评级表明,它可能比其他EC产品在帮助吸烟者戒烟中更有效,但它也可能在非吸烟者中常规使用的潜力更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号