...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Digestive Medicine >Safety and efficacy of tip-in endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile colorectal polyps: A single-center experience in Taiwan
【24h】

Safety and efficacy of tip-in endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile colorectal polyps: A single-center experience in Taiwan

机译:尖端内镜粘膜切除术对大型无牙胚结直肠息肉的安全性和有效性:台湾的单中心体验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an established technique for treating large colonic polyps. However, en bloc resection of large sessile lesions using conventional EMR is technically challenging and can generally be performed only in a piecemeal manner, resulting in low radical resection rates and high recurrence rates. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), a more difficult and time-consuming technique, is an alternative procedure with high en bloc resection rates and low recurrence rates. Therefore, we present a novel technique: tip-in EMR. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of tip-in EMR for the en bloc resection of large sessile colorectal polyps or laterally spreading tumors (LSTs). In this retrospective observational study, we included patients who underwent tip-in EMR for the removal of large colonic polyps (>10 mm) at Shuang Ho Hospital over a 2-year period (September 2015 to September 2017). Clinical variables, including age, gender, polyp size and morphology, procedure time, complications, and pathology, were analyzed. A total of 46 polyps were removed from 42 adult patients through tip-in EMR. The patients' mean +/- SD age was 61.0 +/- 12.0 years. The polyps were located in the right-side colon, transverse colon, left-side colon, and rectum in 39.1%, 17.4%, 37.0%, and 6.5% of the patients, respectively. The mean polyp size was 20.4 +/- 5.6 mm (range = 10-35 mm). LSTs were the predominant polyp type (n = 37, 81.5%). Among all LSTs (n = 37), 12 lesions were of granular type, and 25 lesions were nongranular. All polyps were removed en bloc using tip-in EMR. The mean procedure time was 14.9 +/- 8.8 min. Immediate bleeding occurred in only one patient (2.2%). No patient developed perforation or delayed bleeding. Regarding histopathological findings, 9 polyps (19.6%) were sessile serrated adenomas, 16 (34.8%) were tubular adenomas, 12 (26.1%) were tubulovillous adenomas, and 1 (2.2%) was a villous adenoma. High-grade dysplasia was observed in four polyps (8.7%), and one lesion was an in situ carcinoma. Surveillance colonoscopy was performed in 20 patients (47.6%) over a mean follow-up period of 12.7 +/- 5.3 months. Among these patients, only one patient exhibited local recurrence. Tip-in EMR is a novel alternative technique for polyp resection that is proven to be relatively safe and efficient for the en bloc removal of large sessile colonic polyps.
机译:内镜粘膜切除(EMR)是一种治疗大型结肠息肉的建立技术。然而,使用常规EMR的大型牙龈病变的EN集团切除在技术上是具有挑战性的,并且通常只能以零碎的方式进行,导致远离激进切除率和高复发率。内窥镜粘膜粘膜解剖(ESD),一种更困难且耗时的技术,是具有高en Bloc切除率和低复发率的替代程序。因此,我们提出了一种新颖的技术:尖端EMR。我们评估了尖端EMR的可行性和安全性,以便EN集团切除大型术术息肉或横向扩散肿瘤(LSTS)。在这项回顾性的观察研究中,我们包括在2年期间(2015年9月至2017年9月)的双浩医院中移除尖端EMR的患者。分析了临床变量,包括年龄,性别,息肉尺寸和形态,程序时间,并发症和病理学。通过尖端EMR从42名成年患者中除去共46个息肉。患者的平均+/- SD年龄为61.0 +/- 12.0岁。息肉分别位于右侧结肠,横向结肠,左侧结肠,和直肠,分别为39.1%,17.4%,37.0%和6.5%的患者。平均息肉尺寸为20.4 +/- 5.6毫米(范围= 10-35毫米)。 LSTS是主要的息肉类型(n = 37,81.5%)。在所有LST(n = 37)中,12个病变是颗粒式,25个病变是非平坦的。使用尖端EMR拆除所有息肉。平均程序时间为14.9 +/- 8.8分钟。只有一个患者发生立即出血(2.2%)。没有患者发育穿孔或延迟出血。关于组织病理学发现,9个息肉(19.6%)是无梗塞腺瘤的腺瘤,16(34.8%)是管状腺腺瘤,12(26.1%)是小管状腺瘤,1(2.2%)是绒毛腺瘤。在四个息肉(8.7%)中观察到高级发育性,并且一个病变是原位癌。监测结肠镜检查于20名患者(47.6%),平均随访时间为12.7 +/- 5.3个月。在这些患者中,只有一名患者表现出局部复发。提示IMR是一种用于息肉切除的新型替代技术,其被证明是对ZHOC拆除大型无柄结肠息肉的互联网息肉相对安全和有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号