首页> 外文期刊>Acta Radiologica >Do radiologists detect chronic thromboembolic disease on computed tomography?
【24h】

Do radiologists detect chronic thromboembolic disease on computed tomography?

机译:放射科医生是否检测到计算断层扫描的慢性血栓栓塞疾病?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), a complication of acute pulmonary embolism, is a potentially curable form of pulmonary hypertension (PH). CTEPH is under-diagnosed for a number of reasons leading to delayed referral or missed diagnosis; however, the frequency of misdiagnosis of CTEPH findings on computed tomography (CT) is currently unknown. Purpose To evaluate the extent of misdiagnosis of CTEPH on CT. Material and Methods We studied the original CT reports from 35 patients with confirmed CTEPH diagnosis referred to a specialist center for pulmonary endarterectomy during 2011-2016. The patients' CT reports were assessed according to a standardized form and compared to a consensus reading by two expert radiologists. Results The expert reading identified all CTEPH cases. However, in the original reports, the terminology "CTEPH" was only used in two patients. Another seven descriptive reports picked up the combination of PH and vascular signs of CTEPH without making a definitive diagnosis. Taking these nine cases as positive for CTEPH, the overall sensitivity on a diagnostic level was 26%. Pulmonary arterial abnormalities were described in isolation in 63% with no mention of PH or CTEPH. Signs of PH and mosaic attenuation were documented in 53% and 6% of the original reports, respectively, where it could be seen on the CT examination. Conclusion The study shows that radiologists frequently miss CTEPH findings, leading to a falsely low sensitivity for CT. There was also a notable discrepancy in how the findings were presented in radiology reports.
机译:背景技术慢性血栓栓塞肺动脉高血压(CTEPH),急性肺栓塞并发症,是一种潜在的肺动脉高压(pH)的可固化形式。由于延迟推荐或错过诊断的许多原因,CTeph被诊断出来了;然而,计算断层扫描(CT)上CTeph发现的误诊频率目前未知。目的评价CT的CTEPH的误诊程度。我们研究了来自35例患者的患者的原始CT报告,在2011-2016期间提到了肺结滴切除术专家中心的CTEPH诊断。患者的CT报告根据标准化的形式进行评估,并与两个专家放射科医师的共识阅读相比。结果专家阅读鉴定了所有CTEPH病例。然而,在原始报告中,术语“CTEPH”仅用于两名患者。另外七个描述性报告拾起了CTEPH的pH和血管标志的组合而不进行明确的诊断。将这九例呈现为CTHEPH的阳性,诊断水平的整体敏感性为26%。肺动脉异常以63%的分离描述,没有提到pH或CTeph。 PH和马赛克衰减的迹象分别记录在53%和6%的原始报告中,可以在CT检查中看到它。结论该研究表明,放射科医生经常小姐CTEPH发现,导致CT的虚假敏感性。如何在放射学报告中呈现出发现的显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号