首页> 外文期刊>Acta Radiologica >Long-term prognostic value of coronary computed tomography angiography in chest pain patients
【24h】

Long-term prognostic value of coronary computed tomography angiography in chest pain patients

机译:胸痛患者冠状动脉计算机断层造影血管造影的长期预测值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is increasingly used to detect coronary artery disease (CAD), but long-term follow-up studies are still scarce. Purpose To evaluate the prognostic value of CCTA in patients with suspected CAD. Material and Methods A total of 1205 consecutive CCTA patients with chest pain were classified as normal coronary arteries, non-obstructive CAD, or obstructive CAD. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac event (MACE), defined as a composite outcome including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, or late revascularization (after 90 days). Results Over 7.5 years follow-up (median = 3.1 years), Kaplan-Meier estimates demonstrated a MACE in 1.0%, 4.6%, and 20.7% in normal coronary arteries, non-obstructive CAD, and obstructive CAD, respectively. Log rank test for pairwise comparisons showed significant differences between non-obstructive CAD and normal coronary arteries (P = 0.023) and between obstructive CAD and normal coronary arteries (P 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, adjusting for classical risk factors, non-obstructive CAD and obstructive CAD were independent predictors of MACE, with hazard ratios (HR) of 3.22 (P = 0.041) and 25.18 (P 0.001), respectively. Conclusion Patients with normal coronary arteries have excellent long-term prognosis, but the risk for MACE increases with non-obstructive and obstructive CAD. Both non-obstructive and obstructive CAD are independently associated with future ischemic events.
机译:背景技术冠状动脉计算机断层造影血管造影(CCTA)越来越多地用于检测冠状动脉疾病(CAD),但长期随访研究仍然稀缺。目的评价CCTA在疑似CAD患者中CCTA的预后价值。材料和方法总共1205名胸痛的CCTA患者被归类为正常冠状动脉,非阻塞性​​CAD或阻塞性CAD。主要结果是主要的不良心脏事件(MACE),被定义为包括心脏死亡,心肌梗死,不稳定的心绞痛或晚期血运重建(后​​90天后的晚期血运重建的复合结果。结果7.5年以上的后续行动(中位数= 3.1岁),Kaplan-Meier估计分别在普通冠状动脉,非阻塞性​​CAD和阻塞性CAD中展示了1.0%,4.6%和20.7%的爵士。成对比较的日志等级测试显示出非阻塞性CAD和正常冠状动脉(P = 0.023)和阻塞性CAD和正常冠状动脉之间的显着差异(P <0.001)。在多变量分析中,调整古典风险因素,非阻塞性​​CAD和阻塞性CAD是术的独立预测因子,危险比率(HR)分别为3.22(p = 0.041)和25.18(P <0.001)。结论冠状动脉正常的患者具有优异的长期预后,但佩纳的风险随着非阻塞性和阻塞性的CAD增加。非阻塞性和阻碍性的CAD都与未来的缺血事件无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号