...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Radiologica >Diagnostic performance of ankle ultrasound for diagnosing anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligament injuries: a meta-analysis
【24h】

Diagnostic performance of ankle ultrasound for diagnosing anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligament injuries: a meta-analysis

机译:踝关节诊断性能诊断术治疗前跖骨和钙质韧带损伤:META分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background Ankle ultrasound imaging could be an option with higher priority due to its lack of radiation, and cost- and time-effectiveness. However, previous studies regarding anterior tibiofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament injuries have shown varied results. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ankle ultrasound for anterior tibiofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament injuries. Material and Methods PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for diagnostic accuracy studies that used ultrasound for diagnosing anterior tibiofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament injuries. Bivariate and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic modeling were used to evaluate diagnostic performance. Subgroup analysis was performed using studies according to severity of the injury (complete and partial anterior tibiofibular ligament tear). We performed meta-regression analyses for heterogeneity exploration. Results Ten articles involving a total of 380 patients were included. For anterior tibiofibular ligament injury, the summary sensitivity, summary specificity, and area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were 0.99, 0.92, and 0.99, respectively. For calcaneofibular ligament injury, the summary sensitivity, summary specificity, and AUC were 0.95, 0.99, and 0.95, respectively. In subgroup analysis, for complete anterior tibiofibular ligament tear, the summary sensitivity, summary specificity, and AUC were 0.96, 0.82, and 0.96, respectively. For partial anterior tibiofibular ligament tear, the summary sensitivity, summary specificity, and AUC were 0.90, 0.82, and 0.93, respectively. Among the various potential covariates, proportion of anterior tibiofibular ligament tear, ultrasound interpreter, and reference standard were associated with specificity heterogeneity. Conclusion Ankle ultrasound demonstrates high diagnostic performance in the diagnosis of anterior tibiofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament injuries. We recommend ultrasound performed by a musculoskeletal radiologist as a first-line diagnostic tool to diagnose anterior tibiofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament injuries.
机译:背景技术脚踝超声成像可能是由于其缺乏辐射和成本和时间效率而具有更高优先级的选项。然而,先前关于前胫骨韧带和钙质鹦鹉韧带损伤的研究表明了不同的结果。目的是评估踝关节肝脏抗胫腓韧带和韧带韧带损伤的诊断性能。搜索了材料和方法PubMed和Embase数据库,用于诊断准确性研究,用于诊断前胫骨韧带和钙质纤维韧带损伤的超声波。双变量和分层摘要接收器操作特征建模用于评估诊断性能。使用根据损伤严重程度(完全和部分前胫骨韧带撕裂)的研究进行亚组分析。我们对异质性勘探进行了元回归分析。结果包括10项涉及共380名患者的十篇文章。对于前胫骨韧带损伤,分层概述接收器操作特性曲线(AUC)下的总结敏感性,摘要特异性和面积分别为0.99,0.92和0.99。对于韧带韧带损伤,总结敏感性,摘要特异性和AUC分别为0.95,0.99和0.95。在亚组分析中,对于完全前胫骨韧带撕裂,总结敏感性,摘要特异性和AUC分别为0.96,0.82和0.96。对于部分前胫骨韧带撕裂,总结敏感性,摘要特异性和AUC分别为0.90,0.82和0.93。在各种潜在的协变量中,前胫骨韧带撕裂,超声解释器和参考标准的比例与特异性异质性有关。结论踝关节超声证明了诊断前胫骨韧带和钙质韧带损伤的高诊断性能。我们建议通过肌肉骨骼放射科学家进行超声,作为诊断前胫骨韧带和钙质韧带损伤的一线诊断工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号