首页> 外文期刊>Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica >Age at migration and the risk of psychotic disorders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
【24h】

Age at migration and the risk of psychotic disorders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

机译:迁移年龄和精神病疾病的风险:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To conduct a systematic review and meta‐analysis of the existing evidence on the association between age at migration and the risk of psychotic disorders. Methods Observational studies were eligible for inclusion if they presented data on the association between age at migration and the risk of psychotic disorders among first‐generation migrant groups. We used two random effects meta‐analyses to pool effect estimates for each stratum of age at migration relative to (i) a native‐born reference category and (ii) the youngest age stratum (0 to 2?years). Results Ten studies met inclusion criteria, and five were included in the meta‐analysis. The risk of psychotic disorder among people who migrate prior to age 18 is nearly twice as high as the native‐born population, with no evidence of effect modification by age strata. People who migrate during early adulthood (19 to 29?years) have a similar risk of psychotic disorder as the native‐born population (IRR?=?0.93, 95% CI?=?0.60, 1.44) and a lower risk relative to those who migrate during infancy (0 to 2?years) (IRR?=?0.58, 95% CI?=?0.33, 1.04). Conclusions Migrant status is one of few well‐established risk factors for psychotic disorder, yet we have limited understanding of the underlying etiology. The findings of this review advance our understanding of this association and identify high‐risk groups to target for intervention.
机译:目的是对现有的迁移与精神病障碍的年龄关联的现有证据进行系统审查和荟萃分析。方法有资格包含关于迁移年龄的协会的数据以及第一代移民群体的精神病患者的风险,有资格包容。我们使用了两个随机效应Meta分析来汇率估计,在迁移时的每种年龄相对于(i)天然出生的参考类别和(ii)最小的年龄层(0到2年)。结果十项研究符合纳入标准,其中5项均纳入荟萃分析中。在18岁之前迁移的人的精神病障碍的风险几乎是本土人群的两倍,没有通过年龄地层进行影响的证据。在成年早期(19至29岁以下)迁移的人具有与本土出生的人群(IRR?= 0.93,95%CI?=?0.60,1.44)和相对于那些较低的风险谁在婴儿期间迁移(0到2年)(IRR?= 0.58,95%CI?=?0.33,1.04)。结论移民状况是精神病疾病的少数良好的危险因素之一,但我们对潜在病因的了解有限。本综述调查结果推进了我们对此协会的理解,并确定高风险群体以进行干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号