首页> 外文期刊>Administration and policy in mental health >Individualized Progress Measures Are More Acceptable to Clinicians Than Standardized Measures: Results of a National Survey
【24h】

Individualized Progress Measures Are More Acceptable to Clinicians Than Standardized Measures: Results of a National Survey

机译:临床医生的个性化进展措施比标准化措施更容易:国家调查结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Despite research supporting measurement-based care grounded in standardized progress measures, such measures are underutilized by clinicians. Individualized measures of client-specific targets present an alternative, but little is known about their acceptability or use. We compared attitudes toward and use of standardized and individualized progress measures in a national sample of 504 clinicians. Clinicians reported neutral to positive attitudes toward both types of measures, but strongly preferred and were more likely to use individualized measures. Clinician attitudes, theoretical orientation, and work setting predicted assessment preferences and practices. Implications for dissemination and implementation of measurement-based care are discussed.
机译:摘要尽管研究支持基于衡量的小心,但在标准化进展措施下,这些措施是由临床医生未化的。 客户特定目标的个性化措施呈现替代方案,但对其可接受性或使用很少。 我们将态度与504名临床医生的国家样本中的标准化和个性化进展措施进行了比较和使用。 临床医生报告中性对两种措施的积极态度,但强烈的优先,更有可能使用个性化措施。 临床医生态度,理论取向和工作环境预测评估偏好和实践。 讨论了对传播和实施基于测量的护理的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号