首页> 外文期刊>Administration and policy in mental health >A 20-Site Comparison of Transition-in-Place Versus Traditional Transitional Housing Programs
【24h】

A 20-Site Comparison of Transition-in-Place Versus Traditional Transitional Housing Programs

机译:一种20位转型的转型与传统过渡住房计划的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Transition-in-Place (TIP) is a housing model being piloted in the veterans affairs transitional housing program, Grant & Per Diem (GPD). This observational 20-site study compares characteristics and outcomes of 488 clients in TIP and 10,388 clients in traditional GPD programs. TIP participants were younger, better educated, healthier, and reported higher employment income than traditional GPD participants. Adjusting for these differences, TIP participants were more likely to have their own housing and reported higher employment and public support income at program exit, although the differences were small. These results inform use of the TIP model as a public health intervention.
机译:摘要出现过渡(提示)是在退伍军人事务过渡住房计划,Grant&amp中驾驶的住房模型; 每日迪姆(GPD)。 该观察到20位现场研究将CIP中488名客户的特点和结果与传统GPD计划中的10,388名客户进行了比较。 提示参与者更年轻,更好地了解,更健康,并报告了比传统的GPD参与者更高的就业收入。 调整这些差异,提示参与者更有可能拥有自己的住房,并报告计划退出的更高的就业和公共支持收入,尽管差异很小。 这些结果可通知使用提示模型作为公共卫生干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号