首页> 外文期刊>Acta Neurochirurgica >Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging parameters for objective assessment of the magnitude of tethered cord syndrome in patients with spinal dysraphism
【24h】

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging parameters for objective assessment of the magnitude of tethered cord syndrome in patients with spinal dysraphism

机译:用于脊柱渗透患者的束缚脐带综合征幅度的客观评估动态磁共振成像参数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundDynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based criteria for diagnosing magnitude of tethered cord syndrome (TCS) in occult spinal dysraphism are proposed.MethodsIn this prospective, case-control design study, MRI lumbosacral spine was performed in 51 subjects [pilot group (n=10) without TCS (for defining radiological parameters), control group (n=10) without TCS (for baseline assessment), and study group (n=31) with spinal dysraphism (thick filum terminale [n=12], lumbar/lumbosacral meningomyelocoele [n=6], and lipomyelomeningocoele [n=13])]. The parameters compared in control and study groups included oscillatory frequency (OF), difference in ratio, in supine/prone position, of distance between posterior margin of vertebral body and anterior margin of spinal cord (oscillatory distance [OD]), with canal diameter, at the level of conus as well as superior border of contiguous two vertebrae above that level; delta bending angle (BA), difference, in supine/prone position, of angle between longitudinal axis of conus and that of lower spinal cord; and sagittal and axial root angles, subtended between exiting ventral nerve roots and longitudinal axis of cord. An outcome assessment at follow-up was also done.ResultsIn the study group (cord tethered), significantly less movement at the level of conus (OF0, p=0.013) and one level above (OF1, p=0.03) and significant difference in BA (p=0.0) were observed in supine and prone positions, compared to controls. Ventral nerve root stretching resulted in sagittal/axial root angle changes. Median OF (0.04) in the lipomyelomeningocoele group was significantly less than that in control group (0.23). Median OF was also lesser in patients with thick filum terminale or meningomyelocele. Difference in median sagittal and axial root angles among the study and control groups was statistically significant (p=0.00).ConclusionNew dynamic MRI-based parameters to establish the presence and magnitude of TCS have been defined. OF measured the extent of loss of translational cord displacement in supine and prone positions; BA defined the relative angulation of conus with lower spinal cord, and sagittal and axial root angles represented ventral nerve root stretching. The difference in OF or BA was minimum in the group with thick filum terminale and progressively increased in the groups with lipomyelomeningocele and meningomyelocele.
机译:BackgroundDynamic磁共振成像(MRI)基于隐匿性脊柱渗透物中的核心曲线综合征(TCS)的数量标准。方法在51个受试者[试点组(N. = 10)没有TCS(用于定义放射学参数),对照组(N = 10)没有TCS(用于基线评估),研究组(n = 31),具有脊柱呼吸亢进(厚Filum ingecte [n = 12],腰部/ Lumbosacral Meningomyelocoele [n = 6],脂肪瘤培养型[n = 13])]。在控制和研究组比较的参数包括振荡频率(OF),脊髓后缘和脊髓前缘(振荡距离[OD])之间的距离的距离/易于静脉的差距(俯卧位)(振动距离),具有管直径,在康甘达水平以及高于该水平上方的连续两个椎骨的优越边界;三角洲弯曲角度(BA),差异,仰卧/俯卧位,锥形圆柱之间的角度和下脊髓的角度;和矢状和轴向根角,呈在出口腹神经根和纵向轴之间。随访的结果也是如此。评估研究组(脐带束缚),在锥形水平(OF0,P = 0.013)和高于(OF1,P = 0.03)的水平上显着较低的运动和显着差异与对照相比,以仰卧和俯卧位观察Ba(P = 0.0)。腹侧神经根拉伸导致矢状/轴向根角度变化。 Lipomyelomeningocoele组(0.04)中的中位数显着小于对照组(0.23)。中位数也较少患者浓密的粉末末端或脑膜炎症患者。研究和对照组中位矢状和轴向角差异有统计学意义(P = 0.00)。结论新的基于MRI的参数,以确定TCS的存在和幅度。测量仰卧位和俯卧位的翻译绳索损失程度; BA定义了具有较低脊髓的锥体的相对角度,矢状和轴向角表示腹神经根伸展。在具有厚Filum inallee的组中的差异或Ba的差异是最小的,并且在具有Lipomyelomeningocele和Meningomyelocele的组中逐渐增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号