AbstractThe possibility of shocks was first suggested by Stokes in 1848, but no consistent theory emer'/> Shock discontinuities: from classical to non-classical shocks
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Mechanica >Shock discontinuities: from classical to non-classical shocks
【24h】

Shock discontinuities: from classical to non-classical shocks

机译:休克不连续性:从古典到非古典冲击

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AbstractThe possibility of shocks was first suggested by Stokes in 1848, but no consistent theory emerged for another almost 30?years. Indeed, severe criticism by Lord Kelvin and Lord Rayleigh led him to finally discard this idea. In the meantime, algebraic shock conditions had been derived by Rankine and Hugoniot, and their names have come to be associated with the shock conditions generally. As Thompson (Compressible-fluid dynamics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1972) concludes, “Stokes’s claim to recognition for his discovery has been diverted by circumstance.” Starting with a brief discussion of these early developments, the present review paper will then concentrate on the important question of how to select from all formally possible solutions of the Rankine–Hugoniot jump relations those which are physically realizable solutions. This is at the core of the so-called admissibility problem. Of course, a necessary condition is provided by the second law of thermodynamics which states that the entropy must not decrease during adiabatic changes of state. For perfect gases, this requirement is also a sufficient condition to rule out “impossible” shocks. For fluids with an arbitrary equation of state and/or situations where in addition to thermoviscous effects, dispersive effects also come into play this is not the case in general. The selection of physically admissible solutions is then found to be a more delicate matter and may result in new types of shocks which differ distinctively from their classical counterparts and, therefore, are termed non-classical shocks.]]>
机译:<![cdata [ <标题>抽象 ara id =“par1”>第1848年首次提出冲击的可能性,但没有一致的理论出现了另一个近30年的时间。事实上,Kelvin勋爵和Rayleigh勋爵的严重批评使他终于抛弃了这个想法。与此同时,通过兰宁和Hugoniot来源的代数休克条件,他们的名字一般来说与休克条件相关联。作为汤普森(可压缩流体动力学,McGraw-Hill,纽约,1972)的结论是,“Stokes索赔为他的发现表达已经被情况转移。”从简要讨论这些早期发展,目前的审查文件将集中精力如何选择如何从Qualine-Hugoniot跳跃关系的所有正式可能的解决方案中选择,这些问题是物理可实现的解决方案。这是所谓可容许问题的核心。当然,热力学的第二律规律提供了必要的条件,这指出熵在绝热变动期间不得减少。对于完美的气体,这一要求也是一个足够的条件,以排除“不可能”的冲击。对于具有任意状态的状态和/或情况的流体,其中除了热敏效果之外,分散效果也在发挥作用,这不是一般的情况。然后发现物理允许的解决方案的选择是一种更细致的物质,可能导致新类型的冲击,这与其经典对应物不同,因此被称为非古典冲击。 ] ]

著录项

  • 来源
    《Acta Mechanica》 |2018年第2期|共19页
  • 作者

    Alfred Kluwick;

  • 作者单位

    Institute of Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer TU Wien;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 力学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号