首页> 外文期刊>Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges >Comparison of Continuing Medical Education at U.S. Medical Schools and Other Accredited Organizations: A 20-Year Analysis
【24h】

Comparison of Continuing Medical Education at U.S. Medical Schools and Other Accredited Organizations: A 20-Year Analysis

机译:美国医学院和其他认可组织继续医学教育的比较:20年分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Purpose To describe a long-term overview of accredited continuing medical education (CME) at M.D.-granting medical schools in the United States. Method Self-reported data about type, duration, and numbers of learner participants of accredited CME activities and income for CME units from each medical school were compiled annually by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) between 1998 and 2017. Comparisons were made with data from all other ACCME-accredited organizations. Results Between 1998 and 2017, medical schools represented 18%–19% of all ACCME-accredited organizations. CME activities, hours of instruction, learner participants, and income increased gradually until reaching the highest levels between 2008 and 2011 before remaining constant. In 2017, each school generated a median of 132 activities (interquartile range [IQR]: 66–266), of which 44% were courses and 31% were regularly scheduled series (RSS), and a median of 29,824 learner interactions (IQR: 8,464–46,255). Total income rose gradually until 2010 before declining. In 2017, each school reported a median annual income of $1.0 million (IQR: $0.2 million – $2.9 million) from CME activities, comprising 44% from registration fees, 39% from commercial support, and 14% from advertising and exhibits. Compared with other accredited organization types, medical schools generally developed more RSS activities and proportionally fewer interprofessional and online activities. Conclusions While medical schools represent less than 20% of all ACCME-accredited organizations, their role is pivotal and their influence far-reaching. For medical schools to fulfill their responsibility as education leaders, they need to prioritize support for CME offices and faculty development and implement new approaches to teaching and learning.
机译:文本中提供了补充数字内容。目的在医学博士授予美国医学院校描述认可的继续医学教育(CME)的长期概述。方法自报约型,持续时间和CME认可的活动,并从各医学院CME单位收入的学生参加人数数据由认证委员会1998年和2017年之间的比较继续医学教育(ACCME)每年编制作了与所有其他ACCME认可组织的数据。结果1998年至2017年间,医学院校代表18%-19所有ACCME认可组织的%。 CME活动,教学,学习的参与者,和收入的时间逐渐增加,直到保持不变之前达到2008年至2011年间的最高水平。在2017年,产生的每个学校132个活动的中值(四分位数间距[IQR]:66-266),其中44%为课程和31%是定期系列(RSS),以及29824个学习者相互作用(IQR的中值: 8,464-46,255)。总收入逐渐上升,到2010年下降了。在2017年,每所学校报告的$ 100万(IQR:$ 0.2亿 - $ 290万美元)的中位年收入从CME的活动,包括注册费44%,从商业支持39%,并从广告和展品14%。与其他认可机构类型相比,医学院校一般开发更多RSS活动和按比例减少跨专业和在线活动。结论:虽然医学院校代表所有ACCME认可组织的不到20%,他们的作用是举足轻重的和他们的影响力深远。对于医疗学校履行教育领导的责任,他们需要优先考虑CME办事处和师资队伍建设的支持和实施新的教学方法和学习。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号