首页> 外文期刊>Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges >Critical Theory: Broadening Our Thinking to Explore the Structural Factors at Play in Health Professions Education
【24h】

Critical Theory: Broadening Our Thinking to Explore the Structural Factors at Play in Health Professions Education

机译:批判理论:扩大我们的思想,探讨卫生专业教育中戏剧的结构因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As part of the Philosophy of Science series of Invited Commentaries, this article on critical theory describes the origins of this research paradigm and its key concepts and orientations (ontology, epistemology, axiology, methodology, and rigor). The authors frame critical theory as an umbrella term for different theories, including feminism, antiracism, and anticolonialism. They emphasize the structural analysis that critical scholars conduct to uncover and sometimes address the role that social, political, cultural, economic, ethnic, and gender factors play in health professions education. They note the importance of acknowledging one’s social location when doing critical research and highlight the core values of democracy and egalitarianism that underpin critical research. Methodologically, the authors stress how critical scholars reject singular truths in favor of more nuanced portraits of concepts and events, mobilize inductive approaches over deductive ones, and use critical theory to develop their projects and analyze their data. Following upon this elucidation of critical theory, the authors apply this paradigm to analyze the sample case of Lee, a medical resident who was involved in a medication error. The authors conclude that research conducted in the critical tradition has the potential to transcend individualistic accounts by revealing underlying structural forces that constrain or support individual agency.
机译:作为邀请评论的科学哲学的一部分,这篇关于批判理论的文章描述了该研究范式的起源及其关键概念和方向(本体,认识论,合理学,方法和严谨)。作者框架批判理论作为不同理论的伞长,包括女权主义,抗侵袭主义和抗殖民主义。他们强调了批判学者揭示的结构分析,有时会解决社会,政治,文化,经济,种族和性别因素在卫生专业教育中发挥的作用。他们注意到在执行关键研究时承认一个人的社会位置的重要性,并突出了基于关键研究的民主和平等主义的核心价值观。方法论上讲,作者强调了赋予统治学者如何拒绝奇异真理,有利于更加细致的概念和事件肖像,调动归纳方法在演绎中,并使用批判理论来开发他们的项目并分析他们的数据。在批判理论阐明后,作者将该范例应用于李,李的样本案例,该留置于涉及药物误差的医疗居民。作者得出结论,在关键传统中进行的研究有可能通过揭示限制或支持个人机构的潜在结构力来超越个人账户。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号