...
首页> 外文期刊>Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges >Mixed Messages or Miscommunication? Investigating the Relationship Between Assessors' Workplace-Based Assessment Scores and Written Comments
【24h】

Mixed Messages or Miscommunication? Investigating the Relationship Between Assessors' Workplace-Based Assessment Scores and Written Comments

机译:混合消息或误解? 调查评估员的工作场所评估分数与书面评论之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose & para;& para;The shift toward broader, programmatic assessment has revolutionized the approaches that many take in assessing medical competence. To understand the association between quantitative and qualitative evaluations, the authors explored the relationships that exist among assessors' checklist scores, task ratings, global ratings, and written comments.& para;& para;Method & para;& para;The authors collected and analyzed, using regression analyses, data from the McMaster Modular Assessment Program. The data were from emergency medicine residents in their first or second year of postgraduate training from 2012 through 2014. Additionally, using content analysis, the authors analyzed narrative comments corresponding to the "done" and "done, but needs attention" checklist score options.& para;& para;Results & para;& para;The regression analyses revealed that the task ratings, provided by faculty assessors, are associated with the use of the "done, but needs attention" checklist score option. Analyses also identified that the "done, but needs attention" option is associated with a narrative comment that is balanced, providing both strengths and areas for improvement. Analysis of qualitative comments revealed differences in the type of comments provided to higher- and lower-performing residents.& para;& para;Conclusions & para;& para;This study highlights some of the relationships that exist among checklist scores, rating scales, and written comments. The findings highlight that task ratings are associated with checklist options while global ratings are not. Furthermore, analysis of written comments supports the notion of a "hidden code" used to communicate assessors' evaluation of medical competence, especially when communicating areas for improvement or concern. This study has implications for how individuals should interpret information obtained from qualitative assessments.
机译:目的¶¶转向更广泛的,方案评估已经彻底改变了许多人评估医疗能力的方法。要了解定量和定性评估之间的关联,提交人探讨了评估员清单分数,任务评级,全球评级和书面评论中存在的关系。&段;&段;方法和段;&段;作者收集了使用回归分析,来自McMaster模块化评估计划的数据。这些数据来自2012年至2014年之前的研究生培训的第一个或第二年的紧急医学居民。另外,使用内容分析,作者分析了与“完成”和“完成”的叙述评论,但需要注意“清单得分选项。 &Para;&Para;结果&Para;&Para;回归分析表明,由教师评估员提供的任务评级与使用“完成,但需要注意”清单分数选项相关。分析还确定了“完成,但需要注意”选项与均衡的叙述性评论有关,提供了改进的优势和领域。定性评论分析揭示了向更高年下和低级居民提供的评论类型的差异。¶¶结论和议案;&段;本研究突出了清单分数,评级尺度中存在的一些关系,和书面评论。调查结果强调,任务评级与清单选项相关联,而全局评级则不是。此外,书面评论的分析支持用于传达评估员对医疗能力的评估的“隐藏代码”的概念,特别是在传达改进或关注的领域时。本研究对个人应如何解释从定性评估中获得的信息的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号