...
首页> 外文期刊>Biodiversity and Conservation >Community completeness as a measure of restoration success: multiple-study comparisons across ecosystems and ecological groups
【24h】

Community completeness as a measure of restoration success: multiple-study comparisons across ecosystems and ecological groups

机译:社区完整性作为恢复成功的衡量标准:跨生态系统和生态群体的多重研究比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When restoring habitat for biodiversity, the most effective outcome will be achieved by restoration projects which target several organism groups or ecosystem types. Such integrated approaches require direct comparisons among different ecological communities while evaluating success of restoration. The Community Completeness Index (CCI) is a recently developed metric that allows such comparisons by accounting for both present and absent but otherwise suitable taxa. We empirically evaluated the applicability of CCI for assessing the outcome of ecological restoration. We analyzed how species richness and the completeness of ecological communities recover after restoration, for different ecological groups and ecosystem types, and how it develops over time after restoration. Analyses were performed on 18 datasets with per site presence-absence data from Northern Europe. Each dataset represented one of the three habitat types (mire, forest, grassland) and different ecological groups (plants, flying insects, epigeic invertebrates). Datasets contained pristine, degraded and restored sites. We calculated the dark diversity and subsequently CCI based on species co-occurrences. Our multiple-study analyses revealed that CCI of grassland plant communities increased faster after restoration than invertebrate communities or plant communities in forests and mires. In addition, flying insect communities demonstrated significantly highest CCI in pristine mires. Some results were significant only for richness but not for CCI indicating species pool effect. Finally, completeness and species richness of restored communities increased with time since restoration. As such, our study demonstrated that CCI is a useful tool in evaluating restoration success across different organism groups and ecosystem types.
机译:在恢复生物多样性的栖息地时,将通过恢复项目实现最有效的结果,其靶向若干生物体或生态系统类型。这种综合方法需要在不同生态社区之间直接比较,同时评估恢复的成功。社区完整性指数(CCI)是最近开发的指​​标,允许通过占现在和缺席但不适当的分类而这样的比较。我们经验评估了CCI对评估生态恢复结果的适用性。我们分析了物种的丰富性和生态社区的完整性如何在恢复后恢复,针对不同的生态群体和生态系统类型,以及如何在恢复后随时间发展。通过来自北欧的每个站点存在缺席数据,对18个数据集进行分析。每个数据集代表了三种栖息地类型(Mire,Forest,Grassland)和不同生态群体(植物,飞行昆虫,Epigeic无脊椎动物)中的一个。数据集包含原始,劣化和恢复的网站。我们计算了基于物种共同发生的黑暗多样性和随后的CCI。我们的多学习分析显示,在恢复后,草地植物社区的CCI比无脊椎动物和森林和泥潭的植物群落更快地增加。此外,飞行昆虫社区在原始泥土中表现出最高的CCI。一些结果仅为丰富性而显着,但不是CCI表明物种池效应。最后,自修复以来,恢复社区的完整性和物种的丰富性增加。因此,我们的研究表明,CCI是评估不同生物体群和生态系统类型的恢复成功的有用工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号