...
首页> 外文期刊>Current medical research and opinion >Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical safety and tolerability of ibuprofen compared with paracetamol in paediatric pain and fever.
【24h】

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical safety and tolerability of ibuprofen compared with paracetamol in paediatric pain and fever.

机译:与海烷酰胺在儿科疼痛和发烧中的临床安全性和布洛芬临床安全性和耐受性的系统评价和荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this review was to compare the tolerability and safety between ibuprofen and paracetamol when used as anti-pyretic and analgesic agents in children up to 18 years of age. METHODS: MEDLINE (1950 to November 2008), EMBASE (1980 to November 2008), The Cochrane Library (2007, Issue 3), ACP Journal Club (1991 to November 2007) and Pascal (1987 to November 2007) were searched for randomised controlled trails (RCTs) (comparing ibuprofen and/or paracetamol with placebo), controlled observational studies and large case series comprised more than 1000 participants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adverse events (AEs) requiring discontinuation of medication; systemic reactions related to ibuprofen or paracetamol; serious AEs that are fatal, life-threatening or require hospitalisation; and serious AEs not requiring hospitalisation. RESULTS: A total of 24 RCTs examined either ibuprofen and/or paracetamol versus placebo for AE data. Twelve other studies meeting our criteria were also included for AE data. Meta-analysis of systemic reactions demonstrated that tolerability and safety of ibuprofen was similar to placebo, as was paracetamol: ibuprofen versus placebo relative risk (RR) 1.39 (95% CI: 0.92, 2.10); paracetamol versus placebo RR 1.57 (95% CI 0.74, 3.33). A total of 2937 systemic AEs occurred in 21,305 patients taking ibuprofen compared with 1,466 systemic AEs in 11,164 patients taking paracetamol: RR 1.03 (95% CI 0.98, 1.10). There was no significant difference between the two groups. Narrative analysis of AE data identified conflicting evidence regarding hepatic injury with paracetamol and group A streptococcal infections with ibuprofen or paracetamol treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Ibuprofen, paracetamol and placebo have similar tolerability and safety profiles in terms of gastrointestinal symptoms, asthma and renal adverse effects. While the study data investigated here may not reflect over-the-counter use, these results are still relevant in the context of any safety concerns relating to general ibuprofen or paracetamol treatment in children.
机译:目的:本综述的主要目的是在18岁的儿童用作抗热物质和镇痛药物时比较布洛芬和扑热息痛之间的耐受性和安全性。方法:MEDLINE(1950年至11月),EMBASE(1980年至2008年11月),Cochrane图书馆(2007年,第3版),ACP期刊俱乐部(1991年至2007年11月)和Pascal(1987年至2007年11月)被检定随机控制TRAILS(RCTS)(比较布洛芬和/或与安慰剂的扑热息痛),受控观察研究和大型案例系列包括超过1000名参与者。主要观察措施:需要停止药物的不良事件(AES);与布洛芬或扑热息醇有关的全身反应;严重的AES是致命的,危及生命或需要住院;和严重的AE不需要住院治疗。结果:共24例RCT检查了布洛芬和/或扑热息痛,对AE数据的安慰剂。 21项符合我们标准的其他研究也被包括AE数据。荟萃分析的系统性反应证明,离子戊烯的耐受性和安全性与安慰剂相似,如扑热息痛:布洛芬与安慰剂相对风险(RR)1.39(95%CI:0.92,2.10);扑热息痛与安慰剂RR 1.57(95%CI 0.74,3.33)。 21,305名服用布洛芬的患者共有2937例全身AES,而11,164名患者服用扑热息痛:RR 1.03(95%CI 0.98,10)。两组之间没有显着差异。 AE数据的叙事分析确定了对乙酰氨基酚的肝损伤的矛盾证据,并对具有布洛芬或扑热氨基酚治疗的链球菌感染。结论:布洛芬,扑热息痛和安慰剂在胃肠道症状,哮喘和肾脏不良反应方面具有相似的耐受性和安全性。虽然这里研究的研究数据可能没有反映过度使用,但这些结果仍然在任何与普通布洛芬或儿童扑热息醇治疗有关的任何安全问题的背景下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号