首页> 外文期刊>Crop Protection >Interactions among fungicides applied at different timings for the control of Botrytis bunch rot in grapevine
【24h】

Interactions among fungicides applied at different timings for the control of Botrytis bunch rot in grapevine

机译:在葡萄树中不同时间应用于不同时间的杀菌剂中的相互作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Botrytis bunch rot (BBR), caused by Botrytis cinerea, is one of the main diseases affecting grapevines. Due to the complexity of the B. cinerea life cycle and the existence of different infection pathways affecting grapevine tissues at both early and late growth stages, fungicides are usually applied sequentially at the end of flowering (A), prebunch closure (B), veraison (C), and before harvest (D). Interactions among fungicides (from different groups) applied at these growth stages were evaluated in this work, with focus on the strategies in which early- and late-season applications are combined (i.e., strategies AB, CD, ABC, ABD, ACD, BCD and ABCD). The evaluation was performed in a set of 116 studies carried out in different years and locations, by comparing the observed (b(obs)) and expected (b(pred)) efficacies in controlling BBR; b(obs) was calculated as the reduction of BBR severity in treated plots compared to untreated ones, while b(pred) was calculated by using a mathematical function. Early-season sprays (i.e., A and B) showed non-additive interactions (i.e., the observed efficacy was significantly lower than expected in case of additive effect) while late-season sprays (i.e., C and D) did. No significant synergistic effects were observed among fungicide sprays. In the early-season, spraying in A was more effective than in B, and both sprays (A and B) were useful under high disease pressure only, when the full ABCD strategy was needed for effective BBR control. Otherwise, the most effective combination was ACD, able to exploit the additive control of the early-season infection pathways and the multiple infection events during berry ripening.
机译:由Botrytis Cinerea引起的Botrytis Bunch Rot(BBR)是影响葡萄树的主要疾病之一。由于B.Cherea生命周期的复杂性以及影响早期和晚期生长阶段的不同感染途径的不同感染途径,杀菌剂通常在开花(A)的末尾依次施用,净额封闭(B),Veraison (c),在收获之前(d)。在这项工作中评估了在这些生长阶段的杀菌剂(来自不同群体)之间的相互作用,重点是早期和晚期申请的策略(即,策略AB,CD,ABC,ABD,ACD,BCD和ABCD)。通过比较观察到的(B(OB))和预期的(B(P7(P7)(B(P7)(B(P7)(B(P7(P7)(B(P7)(B(P7)(B(P7)(B(P7(P7))疗效进行评估,进行评价。 B(OBS)计算为与未处理的图中处理的图中BBR严重程度的减少,而使用数学函数计算B(P7)。早期喷雾(即A和B)显示出非添加剂相互作用(即,在添加效果的情况下,观察到的疗效显着低于预期),而晚期喷雾(即C和D)。在杀菌剂喷雾中没有观察到显着的协同效应。在早期的季节中,在a更有效的季节中喷洒,喷雾(a和b)仅在高疾病压力下仅适用于有效的BBR对照时的完整ABCD策略。否则,最有效的组合是ACD,能够利用浆果成熟期间早期感染途径和多次感染事件的添加剂控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号