首页> 外文期刊>Centaurus: International Magazine of the History of Sciences and Medicine >Editors, referees, and committees: Distributing editorial work at the Royal Society journals in the late 19th and 20th centuries
【24h】

Editors, referees, and committees: Distributing editorial work at the Royal Society journals in the late 19th and 20th centuries

机译:编辑,裁判员和委员会:在19世纪后期和20世纪的皇家社会期刊上分发编辑工作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Ever since the Royal Society replaced the editor of the Philosophical Transactions with an editorial committee in 1752, it created an increasingly complex system which distributed editorial work and responsibility among many individuals. A 1902 suggestion that the Society ought to appoint an editor offers an opportunity to explore what the role of "editor" was believed to be: why might such a role now benefit the Society and its journals? What role might an "editor" play amidst the existing editorial structures? Examining the Royal Society's long-standing commitment to distributed editorial practices offers a counterpoint to histories of academic editorship that focus on the rise of the sole editor. It allows us to investigate the acknowledged challenges of working with distributed editorial practices and to consider the shifting perception of the academic journal editor within the wider editorial system.
机译:自皇家社会在1752年取代了与一名编辑委员会的哲学交易编辑以来,它创造了一个日益复杂的系统,分布了许多人之间的编辑工作和责任。 1902年的建议,该社会应该指定一个编辑,提供有机会探索“编辑”被认为的作用:为什么现在的角色现在可能会使社会及其期刊受益? 在现有的编辑结构中,“编辑”播放的作用可能是什么作用? 审查皇家社会对分布式编辑实践的长期承诺为学术编辑的历史为重点关注唯一编辑的历史。 它允许我们调查与分布式编辑实践合作的承认挑战,并考虑更广泛编辑系统内的学术期刊编辑的传感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号