首页> 外文期刊>Conservation & society >Can the Provision of Alternative Livelihoods Reduce the Impact of Wild Meat Hunting in West and Central Africa?
【24h】

Can the Provision of Alternative Livelihoods Reduce the Impact of Wild Meat Hunting in West and Central Africa?

机译:提供替代生计可以减少西非和中部野生肉类狩猎的影响吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As threats to the world's ecosystems continue to escalate, the demand for evidence-based conservation approaches from conservation scientists, practitioners, policy-makers and donors is growing. Wild meat hunting represents one of the biggest threats to tropical forest ecosystems and various conservation strategies have been employed with the aim of reducing hunting impacts. Alternative livelihood projects have been implemented at the community level to reduce hunting through the provision of protein and income substitutes to wild meat. However, there is scant evidence of these projects' impact on hunting practices and wildlife populations. This study addresses this knowledge gap, focusing on alternative livelihood projects in West Africa and Central Africa. A comprehensive literature review and call for information identified 155 past and current projects, of which 19 were analysed in detail through key informant interviews. The study found that a range of different livelihood alternatives are being offered. Most projects are run by local and national non-governmental organisations, and project managers acknowledged the importance of involving communities in project decision-making; however, many projects are funded through small, short-term grants and struggle to meet their objectives with the available time, funding and capacity. Given these constraints, few projects monitor their outcomes and impacts. Projects also seldom implement conditionalities and sanctions, which may lead to the alternatives offered becoming additional rather than substitutional activities. Applying currently available best-practice guidelines for Integrated Conservation and Development Project design and implementation, including the use of simple monitoring methods for evaluating outcomes and impact, would greatly increase the chances of success for alternative livelihood projects, along with a restructuring of current funding models.
机译:由于对世界生态系统的威胁继续升级,因此对保护科学家,从业者,政策制定者和捐助者的证据保护方法的需求正在增长。野生肉类狩猎是热带森林生态系统的最大威胁之一,各种保护策略已经采用了减少狩猎影响的目的。在社区一级实施了替代生计项目,以减少通过提供蛋白质和收入替代品到野生肉的狩猎。但是,这些项目对狩猎实践和野生动物种群的影响有很大的证据。本研究解决了这一知识差距,重点是西非和中非的替代民生项目。全面的文献综述和呼吁信息确定了155个过去和目前的项目,其中通过关键的信息访谈详细分析了19个。该研究发现,正在提供一系列不同的生计替代品。大多数项目由地方和国家非政府组织经营,项目经理承认涉及项目决策中的社区的重要性;但是,许多项目由小型,短期拨款和斗争为斗争,以满足其目标,并提供资金和能力。鉴于这些限制,很少有项目监测其结果和影响。项目也很少实施条件和制裁,这可能导致所提供的替代方案,而不是替代活动。应用目前可用的最佳实践指南用于综合保护和开发项目设计和实施,包括使用简单的监测方法来评估结果和影响,将大大提高替代生计项目的成功机会,以及当前资金模型的重组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号