...
首页> 外文期刊>CNS spectrums >Gender and cultural issues in psychiatric nosological classification systems
【24h】

Gender and cultural issues in psychiatric nosological classification systems

机译:精神诊断系统中的性别和文化问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Much has changed since the two dominant mental health nosological systems, the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), were first published in 1900 and 1952, respectively. Despite numerous modifications to stay up to date with scientific and cultural changes (eg, exclusion of homosexuality as a disorder) and to improve the cultural sensitivity of psychiatric diagnoses, the ICD and DSM have only recently renewed attempts at harmonization. Previous nosological iterations demonstrate the oscillation in the importance placed on the biological focus, highlighting the tension between a gender-and culture-free nosology (solely biological) and a contextually relevant understanding of mental illness. In light of the release of the DSM 5, future nosological systems, such as the ICD 11, scheduled for release in 2017, and the Research Development Criteria (RDoC), can learn from history and apply critiques. This article aims to critically consider gender and culture in previous editions of the ICD and DSM to inform forthcoming classifications.
机译:自从两种主导的心理健康核肉系统,国际疾病(ICD)和精神障碍诊断和统计手册(DSM)的诊断和统计手册分别分别于1900年至1952年出版。尽管有许多修改与科学和文化的变化保持最新(例如,将同性恋排除为疾病),并且提高精神病诊断的文化敏感性,但ICD和DSM最近才再次重新调整协调。以前的衰老迭代展示了对生物重点的重要性的振荡,突出了无文化臭文体学(完全生物)和对精神疾病的情境相关理解之间的紧张关系。鉴于DSM 5的释放,未来的仪表系统,例如ICD 11,计划于2017年释放,以及研究发展标准(RDOC),可以从历史中学习并应用批评。本文旨在批准在ICD和DSM之前的版本中考虑性别和文化,以通知即将到来的分类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号